何德何能 2023-08-02

I would like to ask why I encountered the message "The following file encountered error while being uploaded. Server responded with 0 code" when uploading my manuscript. What could be the reason for this? Can someone help me with an explanation?

Zhang Yuhang 2023-08-01

07 May 2023 Manuscript Submitted
13 May 2023 With Editor
18 May 2023 Out for Review
05 June 2023 Out for Review
09 June 2023 Revision Required
05 July 2023 Revised Manuscript Submitted
05 July 2023 With Editor
09 July 2023 Out for review
23 July 2023 Out for Review
26 July 2023 Accepted
Summary: After going through a major revision, possibly due to low publication volume, the editor processed the manuscript quickly. The journal has high requirements for innovation and generally has four reviewers who are very diligent. It is recommended to modify the format according to the official website template before submitting and to upload a clean manuscript during revisions to reduce the number of revisions.

风枫之 2023-05-15

He just needs it in APA format. I used EndNote to format it in APA and didn't handle the rest. Only corrected the references during the proofreading of the manuscript.

kevin wong 2023-05-15

Excuse me, OP, does this journal place a lot of emphasis on referencing? I got some minor revisions here.

风枫之 2023-04-26

The editorial department will procrastinate for 3 to 5 days, and the editor will procrastinate for 1 day. I remember that I will submit it for external review after 5 days.

kevin wong 2023-04-26

May I ask, after the first trial, how long will it take for the review to be submitted?

风枫之 2023-04-12

Unfamiliar, don't even know at all. Mainly, the editor doesn't think it's a fatal problem (in fact, it's not a big problem either), it can be changed, and maybe the editor softened due to being in the second round.

shooter 2023-04-12

When submitting, it seems that there is an option to choose and apply, but the publishing house has certain regulations, and not all regions or countries are exempt.

shooter 2023-04-12

How did you manage to retrieve what was rejected? Are you familiar with the editor?

shooter 2023-04-12

In a double-blind trial, it's hard-core~

shooter 2023-04-12

During the vacation, I submitted my work and the processing speed was very fast. I am looking forward to the results.

风枫之 2023-03-23

Received, underwent 2 major revisions and 1 minor revision, totaling 4 months. The efficiency of the editors and reviewers was very high, with the first round taking 1 month and subsequent rounds taking only half a month, even during the Chinese New Year holiday. Sending an email to the editor during the process also received an instant response. The editors and reviewers were also very responsible. I myself didn't even bother reading the entire text, but one of the reviewers seemed to have read it very carefully and provided suggestions for each paragraph. The recommendations given by the editor were also reasonable, and there is hope that they will support you. They won't make arbitrary judgments without reason. Overall, it felt more troublesome than the average journal in the first district. The journal is double-blind, and no author information is allowed to be added. In my response, I listed the contact email and asked them to delete it, treating all articles equally.

风枫之 2023-03-20

Most journals send communication to the corresponding author, and this one is no exception. When there are comments or feedback, they are not visible in the system but can only be seen in the email sent to the corresponding author.

zjut-123 2023-03-20

Dear contributors, may I ask if domestic universities or research institutions can apply for a 50% discount on the publication fee of this journal? I feel that $2070 is still quite a lot.

zjut-123 2023-03-20

Hello, I would like to ask, if my supervisor is the corresponding author of the paper, but I am the one submitting the paper on the website, will the email for editing be sent only to the corresponding author or will I also receive a copy?

风枫之 2023-03-14

23.3.14 Third review in two weeks, minor revisions. Finally convinced the reviewers, just need to make changes to the charts and it's done.

科研小虎子 2023-02-18

What is the recognition level of this journal?

风枫之 2023-02-04

I understand what the reviewer means. We used RANS to calculate, but he thinks that RANS calculations are not accurate, especially in cases of separation, so he finds the results untrustworthy. I'm just wondering if any of you have encountered a situation where a reviewer rejected the paper and the editor asked for revisions, and what was the final outcome?

风枫之 2023-02-03

Not yet, there is a second review, one accepted and one rejected manuscript. The reviewer who rejected the manuscript said that my numerical simulation results matched the experiments too well, and he considered that to be unusual. He couldn't accept it, and then mentioned that my results and discussion should be more in-depth. The Associate Editor and the Editor-in-Chief gave me a chance and provided major revisions. I am preparing to conduct another set of experiments to battle it out with the reviewer.

lynnte 2023-02-03

Hello, have you been hired now?

风枫之 2022-12-26

22.11.29 out for review
22.12.26 One month after the first review, I received feedback. It seems like there are two minor revisions and one major revision. For the two minor revisions, one reviewer kept asking about how I conducted the experiment and why I chose this particular speed. It seems like they don't quite understand. The other reviewer, for the major revision, raised a bunch of difficult questions that are hard to answer. I hope that this reviewer will go easy on me.

Erik93 2022-12-21

Upgrade version returned to the Tier 1 area of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2022.

风枫之 2022-11-28

Still being edited at the moment, the progress is a bit slow.

过毛情人节啊 2022-11-26

22.8.8 Submission
22.8.10 Under review
22.9.10 First review result is out, minor revisions. Five reviewers, four friendly, one not so friendly. AE (Associate Editor) thought it could be resubmitted after major revisions, but the editor gave minor revisions. One month for revisions.
22.10.25 Revised submission. Response to comments with over 10,000 words. To be honest, some review comments were simple, while others were vague, but none were easy to respond to. Extension was granted once.
22.11.25 Accepted. Two reviewers believed that all the issues they raised have been completely addressed and recommended acceptance.
The journal is very efficient, with a review time of about one month each time. Personally, I feel that the journal's review process is quite friendly and has greatly helped improve the quality of the paper.

过毛情人节啊 2022-11-26

Shouldn't it be submitted for review now?

风枫之 2022-11-24

22.11.19 Revised the reference format to APA and resubmitted the manuscript.
22.11.19 Discussed with the journal administrator.
After 5 days, the manuscript has not reached the editor yet, what is going on?

过毛情人节啊 2022-11-22

May I ask how long did it take for the subsequent rounds of review?

过毛情人节啊 2022-11-22

How long does the second trial generally take?

Erik93 2022-11-08

I only have 2 reviewers, and there weren't many opinions. After revision, it was accepted.

过毛情人节啊 2022-08-21

How many reviewers are there, please?