Zachary 2023-08-09

May I ask if you have the same reviewer for both the first and second review?

max01 2023-08-08

It has been a month with the editor, and finally, it is under review. I hope everything goes smoothly!

Zachary 2023-08-07

Does it have a big influence on the results if only one reviewer accepts the review?

zhaojiuzhang 2023-07-21

August 22 - Submitted
August 30 - Under review (date changed twice, difficult to find reviewers)
November 23 - Major revision (20 days)
December 13 - Revision required
December 14 - Under review (date changed twice, difficult to find reviewers)
March 28 - Three experts agreed to review
April 20 - One expert completed review
May 14 - Date changed
June 17 - Date changed
June 26 - Review completed
June 26 - Changed back to under review
July 3 - Minor revision (13 days)
July 15 - Revision required
July 20 - Accepted

This submission had a long journey. It was difficult to find reviewers, and after the revision, we were unable to contact the original reviewer. We continued to face difficulties in finding reviewers and had to send reminders four times. We never expected this journal to be so unreasonable, but the only relief is that it was not rejected in the end.

Zachary 2023-06-14

It has been half a month with the editor, and the schedule has changed once, but there has been no progress so far.

wow哈哈 2023-06-14

I have been in the "with editor" status for a month.

Zachary 2023-06-11

It has been over a week and there is still no progress with the editor.

shanmama 2023-05-30

2022.12.19 submitted
2022.12.19 submitted, and then it's with editor
2023.01.18 under review
Then it remained under review, but the timeframe changed at least three times. I personally guessed that the reviewers had a conflict, and it was later proven to be true.
4.14 required review completed
4.18 reject
There were a total of three reviewers, similar to what happened with Z.A., two were positive and one was negative. For example, the positive ones directly said "the topic of this article is very interesting, I believe it can be published in this journal after some modifications" and "after a certain improvement in quality, this article should be published." But in the end, it was directly rejected. To be honest, it was a bit of a waste of time.
Currently, it has been resubmitted to another journal in the second-tier and is still under review.

Z.A. 2023-04-11

The first reviewer's opinion is to accept the submission directly. The second reviewer had five opinions, three of which were about the formatting of my manuscript (which is ridiculous). First, they said that each paragraph does not need an indent. Second, they said that the title is too long (my title is only 25 words). Third, they said that the subscripts in the nomenclature should be listed separately. The last opinion was that they did not understand my article and thought it was messy. That's it. The editor surprisingly rejected the submission, saying that the reviewers did not agree to publish it. I can't believe it. Does the editor lack judgment or is there another reason? I am speechless about this journal editor. This is the second time this has happened. The first time, the reviewer's comments were very positive, but the editor rejected it directly, delaying my external review for several months. After that, I didn't even make any changes, and I submitted it to RENE (a top-tier journal). The result was that it was accepted after minor revisions. I will definitely not submit to this journal again if the editor does not change. With this editor, it doesn't matter, plus, consider this journal carefully if you are not a foreigner. Ha ha!

豪火灭却 2023-04-06

The second review continues with major revisions. After revision on 03.17, it is currently under review. On 04.04, the decision process has begun. On 04.06, the acceptance notification will be sent.

Z.A. 2023-03-02

2023.02.26 Submitted to journal
2023.02.26 with editor
2023.02.28 with editor
2023.03.01 under review
2023.03.09 under review
2023.04.03 Required Reviews Completed
2023.04.04 Decision in Process
2023.04.06 reject
Two reviewers, the first one accepted it directly, the second one requested major revisions, and the editor rejected it!

Rize 2023-02-28

I want to ask if your manuscript has been accepted now.

豪火灭却 2023-02-06

2022.10.05 submitted to journal
2022.10.21 under review
2022.11.30 major revision
2022.12.20 re-submitted
2023.01.21 under review

I feel that the journal's processing speed has become slower. It has been four months since I submitted it, and it is currently undergoing major revisions after the first review. I hope for a favorable outcome. I have been unable to find reviewers for the first review, and only one reviewer has provided feedback. I am grateful to the editor for giving me the opportunity to make revisions. It is rumored that the journal requires opinions from at least two reviewers for a decision to be made, and I don't know if they will invite new reviewers for this round of review. I am really stressed about this.

srdong 2023-01-11

The speed is quite fast, having undergone one major repair and two minor repairs. Now it's about 7.2 points, and I don't know when it will be able to become a Zone 1 like Building and Environment.

周周 2023-01-11

Has the email been sent? It's really slow, speechless.

shanmama 2023-01-07

I might catch up with Christmas. Submitted on December 19th, today is January 7th and it's still with the editor.
Update:
Submitted on December 19th, 2022.
Under review since January 18th, 2023.
It has been under review continuously, but the status has changed at least three times in between.
RRC on April 14th.
Rejected on April 18th.
There were a total of three reviewers, with two positive and one negative. In the end, it was directly rejected. To be honest, it's a bit of a delay.

healerman 2022-12-12

2022.10.30 submitted to journal
2022.11.01 under review
2022.11.16 major revision
2022.11.27 re-submitted
2022.12.03 under review
2022.12.12 accept
Wishing you all the best!

d调的华丽zh 2022-12-01

2022.8.21 submitted to journal
2022.9.2 with editor
2022.9.5 under review
2022.9.25 major revision
2022.10.16 re-submitted
2022.11.2 major revision
2022.11.11 re-submitted
2022.11.15 under review
2022.11.30 accept

In the first round, there were two major revisions and 18 comments, which were very overwhelming. After the revisions, one reviewer suggested acceptance, while the other had significant doubts and recommended a major revision. Four questions were raised, causing a lot of anxiety. I responded with a 7-page explanation and made modifications accordingly. In the end, the paper was accepted. I appreciate this kind of reviewer who provided valuable and objective feedback, even though they expressed disagreement with my viewpoint. The acceptance was given because the modifications made were reasonable.

冰絮飘雪 2022-11-12

2.17 Initial submission time
2.23 Review
3.31 Review
4.05 Review
5.09 Review
7.07 Review
8.05 Required review completed
8.07 Major revision
8.28 Deadline for submission
8.25 Submission of revised draft
8.26 Editing and reviewing
9.04 Review
9.19 Required review completed
10.3 Minor revision
10.15 Submission of revised draft
10.17 Editing and reviewing
10.23 Review
11.03 Decision-making
11.04 Acceptance
It is a very specific direction of thermal comfort, which is not commonly done in China. The first review was likely rejected, which took a lot of time. The second review is proceeding at a normal pace.

魔鬼月 2022-11-01

It has been half a month with the editor. So slow!!! Feeling dizzy...

Jiang-000 2022-09-08

My state is exactly the same as yours~ Handshake.

SodaOrange 2022-09-08

2022.9.7 summit to the journal - This refers to a summit or meeting that took place on September 7, 2022, and the outcome or results were submitted to a journal.

2022.9.8 with editor - On September 8, 2022, the document or submission was received by the editor of the journal.

2022.9.8 under review - Starting from September 8, 2022, the document or submission is being reviewed by the editor or other reviewers.

2022.9.16 under review - The review process is still ongoing as of September 16, 2022.

2022.10.16 under review - The review process is still ongoing as of October 16, 2022.

2022.11.3 reject - On November 3, 2022, it was decided that the document or submission was rejected and will not be published in the journal.

澳洲混子123 2022-06-22

03/02 Submitted to journal
04/02 With editor
12/02 With editor
13/02 Under review
13/05 Major revision
26/05 Re-submitted
27/05 Under review
30/05 Minor revision
10/06 Re-submitted
12/06 Under review
22/06 Accept

Translation:
03/02 Submitted to journal
04/02 With editor
12/02 With editor
13/02 Under review
13/05 Major revision
26/05 Re-submitted
27/05 Under review
30/05 Minor revision
10/06 Re-submitted
12/06 Under review
22/06 Accept

科研小白h 2022-06-10

May I ask how long it takes for the author to work with the editor? It has been several days for me.

Ustc math trash 2022-05-24

3.29 Submitted
4.1 Under Review
4.23 Major Revision (requested to return the revised version before 5.13, the given time for revision is a bit short)
5.7 Resubmit
5.15 Required reviews completed (estimated to have received responses from only two reviewers)
5.20 Required reviews completed (updating status, probably received response from the third reviewer)
5.23 Decision in process
5.24 Accept (no further comments)

In the field of Operations Research and Optimization, ENB has a very efficient and satisfactory review process compared to others.

江岁寒 2022-05-10

2.28 submit to the journal - Submitted to the journal on February 28th.
3.08 under review - Currently being reviewed.
4.12 major revise - Requires significant revisions.
4.21 resubmit - Need to resubmit.
4.22 under review - Currently being reviewed.
5.1 accept - Accepted on May 1st.

大大鱼 2022-05-06

3.22 submit to the journal - Submitted to the journal on March 22nd.
3.23 under review - Currently being reviewed.
4.8 major revise - Requires significant revisions.
4.27 resubmit - Needs to be submitted again.
4.28 under review - Currently being reviewed.
5.4 decision in the process - Decision is being considered.
5.5 accept - Accepted.

lizeyang 2022-03-21

Submitted to Journal Nov 09, 2021
With Editor Nov 11, 2021
Under Review Nov 14, 2021
Under Review Dec 03, 2021
Under Review Dec 12, 2021
Under Review Dec 15, 2021
Under Review Dec 24, 2021
Under Review Jan 04, 2022
Required Reviews Completed Jan 18, 2022
With Editor Jan 20, 2022

Translation:
Submitted to Journal Nov 09, 2021
With Editor Nov 11, 2021
Under Review Nov 14, 2021
Under Review Dec 03, 2021
Under Review Dec 12, 2021
Under Review Dec 15, 2021
Under Review Dec 24, 2021
Under Review Jan 04, 2022
Required Reviews Completed Jan 18, 2022
With Editor Jan 20, 2022

shenxiu 2022-01-13

Hello, may I ask how long have you been with the editor? How long does it usually take to go under review? I have been with the editor for 4-5 days already and I'm not sure if it's a bad sign.

lizeyang 2021-12-13

Hello, I would like to ask, my "under review" status has changed dates seven times in a month. Do you know what's going on?