Mrs.lemon 2023-07-17

Hello, mine is also the same situation as yours. It has been "Under Review" all along. After a month, I asked the IEEE Help Center and they replied that it is still in the queue, which means it hasn't been assigned to an editor yet. May I ask if your manuscript has been sent for external review? If it has, approximately how long did it take for the external review to start? I am getting anxious...

paper-sender 2023-07-08

Hello, does the number behind the manuscript number represent the number of articles? I thought it was the date... How long did you spend in the Under Review stage?

paper-sender 2023-07-08

Hello! May I ask how long it took in the Under Review stage?

Mrs.lemon 2023-07-05

Hello, why is my submission status different from yours? After I submitted it, it has been "Under Review" all along. A month later, I asked the editor whether this status was for editorial pre-review or peer review, and the editor replied that it was for peer review. However, since I submitted it, this status has not changed. Does it mean that the reviewer was assigned to review my submission as soon as I submitted it?

guan 2023-06-16

Is there a difference of opinion?

Dr.banana 2023-06-02

On average, it takes 2-3 months to receive feedback for each round, and the reviewers' opinions are all very professional.

Dr.banana 2023-06-02

2022.12.15 submit - Submitted on December 15, 2022.
2023.03.21 revised - Revised on March 21, 2023.
2023.05.15 accepted - Accepted on May 15, 2023.

yujun 2023-04-01

Submitted for 5 months, under reviewer status, feeling that the first review time is a bit long.

datouff 2023-02-28

Rejected due to mismatch in direction, and another month of delay is required.

guan 2023-02-10

Is it really that difficult? It's been almost two months for me, and I'm starting to panic a little.

苹果66 2023-02-09

It is estimated that it is still necessary to have a fellow who is easy to talk to.

苹果66 2023-02-09

Terrible submission experience, three months of review, and then one reviewer simply mentioned lack of innovation in a few sentences, another compared it directly with other fields, and the last one's opinion was unclear.

laodong 2023-01-31

August 2022 submission, first review in October;
Submit revised draft at the end of October, second review returned by the end of November;
Submit revised draft in mid-December, final comments returned by mid-January;
Submit on January 19, feedback results given on January 21.

guan 2023-01-31

When did you submit the manuscript?

董莉 2023-01-30

Accepted with revisions
First review took 2 months
Second review with major revisions took 1 month
Third review with minor revisions took 1 month
Feedback on the final review was provided within a week, which is considered quite fast for a journal~

lekko 2023-01-19

Overall, the journal is very good, with a good impact factor as a new publication. It is still in the second tier, but in the future, it should be a top journal in the field of computational sociology. Choosing the Special Issue route may be slightly faster, but each round of revision might take a bit longer. The difficulty is moderate, suitable for submitting papers to top conferences or highly respected journals.

guan 2023-01-10

How long does it usually take to be in the "Under Review" status? I have been in the "Under Review" status since I submitted, and it has been almost a month.

峰灬 2023-01-07

I think the review process of this journal is quite fast. It should develop into a promising journal in the future. In 2022, it directly obtained the CCF C ranking.

babysteps 2023-01-02

"Try using a different browser?"

Dchment 2022-12-29

May I ask if there is a problem with the ORCID submission system now? It doesn't allow linking.

babysteps 2022-12-21

I saw it on the computer conference submission public account, and I only know the editor's email.

guan 2022-12-21

May I ask if there is an ADM email address?

babysteps 2022-12-21

Today, I went out to Zone 2.

babysteps 2022-12-21

On December 21, 2022, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) announced the division of TCSS, and it has been assigned to Zone 2 through an airdrop.

加速审稿 2022-12-14

When can the zoning be released?

lucas2022 2022-12-11

2022.08.05 submit - Submitted on August 5, 2022
2022.10.23 awaiting EIC decision - Waiting for the Editor-in-Chief's decision on October 23, 2022
2022.10.24 major revision - Major revisions requested on October 24, 2022
2022.11.01 resubmit - Resubmitted on November 1, 2022
2022.11.24 AE recommends - Associate Editor recommends on November 24, 2022
2022.11.28 awaiting EIC decision - Waiting for the Editor-in-Chief's decision on November 28, 2022
2022.11.29 accept - Accepted on November 29, 2022

babysteps 2022-12-03

The former three major journals under the IEEE SMC Society, namely Part A, B, and C, have now been restructured into TCYB (CCF B), THMS (CCF B), TSMC (new CCF B), and TCSS (new CCF C). It should be noted that these four journals are now included in the CCF journal recommendation. Having Chinese professors as editors-in-chief can be seen as an advantage. The impact factor of THMS is lower than that of TCSS, but it was included in the CCF B category early on.

苹果66 2022-12-03

The editor-in-chief of that country also has certain biases, after all, everyone votes, and many of the votes from the people benefit their interests. Otherwise, why directly join a social calculation?

babysteps 2022-12-01

The organizer is still IEEE, but the current editor-in-chief is a Chinese professor. It is not considered a Chinese journal, unlike IEEE/CAA JAS which is considered a Chinese journal.

苹果66 2022-12-01

Because of the support from Chinese people, the journal has received certain assistance.