Verified Reviews - DYES AND PIGMENTS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

国服干将 2023-08-03

5.17 submitted
5.20 under review
6.20 reviews completed 2
7.3 reviews completed 2+
7.7 major revision
7.26 article revised
7.28 article accepted for publication
editor Karen De Clerck

Translation:

5.17 submitted
5.20 under review
6.20 reviews completed 2
7.3 reviews completed 2+
7.7 major revision
7.26 article revised
7.28 article accepted for publication
editor Karen De Clerck

荷夕 2023-07-07

Submitted on June 5th, 2023, it has been over a month until July 7th, and the feedback for repair has not yet been received.
Respected reviewers and editors, please expedite the process. I still hope to be eligible for a scholarship before September. Wishing for good luck.

lgy11 2023-07-04

Good luck, give the child a chance to make changes, please, please, kind-hearted reviewer, soft-hearted editor.

贺相东 2023-06-28

The review process is very fast, and the review comments usually come back within twenty days.

@^@ 2023-06-19

May I ask if the email sent after the repair asks to "Check your submission for potential issues"? However, it lists some figures in the supporting literature. Does this mean to provide the original data or something else?

李成族 2023-03-23

Detecting the TRJ, it is also a small district.

举起手来 2023-03-10

Excuse me, does this journal accept articles on fabric defect detection?

乞力马扎罗 2022-11-25

7.4 submitted to journal - This means that a document or article was submitted to a journal on July 4th.
8.14 major revision - This indicates that a document or article underwent a significant revision on August 14th.
10.10 accept - This means that a document or article was accepted on October 10th.

阿宝vs汤大基 2022-11-18

7.20 submitted to journal
7.26 under review
8.20 major revision
8.26 revised submitted
9.04 accept

This is an old-established journal in the industry.
The submission process took less than two months, it was fast and very smooth.
It is very suitable for small projects with high innovation but not too demanding in terms of workload, and it is cost-effective.
I wish dyes continued success and improvement!

dwz 2022-11-04

9.18 submitted to journal
9.26 under review
10.22 minor revision
10.30 revised submitted
11.4 accept
The editor found four reviewers, but the process went very smoothly. The journal was very efficient. I wish the journal continued to improve!

XJU-Lis 2022-10-01

7.31 Submission
Under review as of 8.5, sent to 2 reviewers. Accepted for review on the same day. Review 1 completed on 8.9.
Around 9.5, another reviewer accepted the review. Around 9.15, the number of reviewers increased to 2+. Around 9.20, the number of reviewers accepting the review also increased to 2+. Completion of reviews increased to 2.
On 10.1, review acceptance increased to 2+. Completion of reviews increased to 2.
It has been two months, it's so slow. Hoping for good results.

CQDs 2022-09-25

"This is a hybrid journal. The magazine publishes both subscription and open access articles. Based on the institution and funding details you provide, we will offer personalized publishing options for you. Please note that at this stage of your submission, you are only indicating your preference. We will request your final choice after the journal accepts your manuscript. Hahaha, it's true that they are deceiving people. It costs 3010 dollars. If they charge in the end, it's better to switch to another journal directly. Do foreigners realize how easy it is for Chinese researchers to earn money?"

李稳稳冲冲冲 2022-08-04

6.15 submitted to journal
6.16 under review
7.12 major revision
7.29 revised submitted
8.3 accept

Virgo, very smooth process. The journal's speed is impressive. Wishing the journal continued success!

mmm30 2022-08-03

Submitted in late March, received reviewer comments one month later, underwent major revisions for two months, waited two weeks after resubmission for minor revisions, completed them within two months, and uploaded the revised manuscript ahead of schedule. Accepted on the same day it was received.

ibuprofenaaa 2022-07-19

5.26 submitted
5.28 under review
6.3 major revision
7.9 revision submitted
7.13 accept
7.16 proof / online

Translation:
5.26 submitted
5.28 under review
6.3 major revision
7.9 revision submitted
7.13 accept
7.16 proof / online

周总1125 2022-05-03

Submitted to Journal on April 25th, it has been over a week. I do remember that it used to be quite fast before, including the speed of rejection.

dpcn 2022-05-02

A great magazine, the speed of handling articles is quite fast.

lkk3 2022-04-17

4.11 sub - 4.11 subject
4.16 with editor - 4.16 in collaboration with the editor

lkk3 2022-04-14

It has been 3 days and the manuscript is still under review in the journal. How long does it usually take to assign an editor?

yanzhq 2022-04-12

Has it slowed down now? It has been 10 days since submission, and there is still no manuscript number. Is it still in the "Submitted to journal" status?

Cecilia-ZX 2022-02-25

Received at the editorial office on December 6, 2021.
Received two reviews, one major revision and one minor revision, on December 27, 2021.
Given 2 months to make the revisions.
Submitted the revised article on February 19, 2022.
Article accepted for publication on February 24, 2022.

lucky-yoyo 2022-02-15

After the revision, I will share it with everyone. At that time, I felt reassured after reading everyone's comments. I submitted it in November and it was reviewed the same day. A month later, I received the reviewer's comments which required a major revision, two minor revisions, and one rejection. I was given two months to conduct additional experiments and after submitting them, it was accepted within two days. Then, it went through the proofreading process and is now available online. I am grateful to the editor and every reviewer.

lucky-yoyo 2022-02-15

dyes and pigments, the review speed is fast and the efficiency is high. The submission is sent for review on the same day, and the review comments are received one month later. Two months are given for revisions. After two days of submission, it is accepted. The proof is provided two days later.

ajkdajkld 2022-02-13

2022.01.06 Submission
2022.02.01 Major revision
2022.02.08 Revised
2022.02.12 Accepted

周倩0527 2021-12-25

van der auweraer found six reviewers, which was astonishing. At that time, only the second reviewer opposed, requiring major revisions, while the others only suggested minor changes. However, the review process was still relatively quick online.

ZBJM 2021-11-30

Same question, have the experts who have published in Dyes and Pigments confirmed if every author needs to be confirmed?

huluobei 2021-11-09

10.30 Receive directly! Thanks to Professor JuYoung Yoon for editing, super fast efficiency! It seems that only the reviewer who conducted the final major revision was sent for the final review.
11.1 Proof, directly online.

乌龟在飞 2021-10-28

The review process was quite fast... Indeed, but when it comes to minor revisions, they always add another reviewer, and then it keeps dragging on and on. I saw others receiving feedback within a month at the latest, but it took me two months to receive mine.

nyy 2021-10-19

8.26 submission was under review that evening. The editor is Professor Juyoung Yoon from Korea.
9.22 major revision. In the first review, two minor revisions were received, and one rejection. The reviewer who rejected provided sharp comments. The editor assigned another reviewer who gave constructive suggestions for major revisions. Eventually, the editor also requested major revisions.
10.15 revised manuscript submitted again and is currently under review. I would like to ask how the second review with rejection comments from the reviewers went.

chemeng 2021-10-18

sep. 16, 2021 submitted
oct. 7, 2021 revision requested, 2 reviewers, around 10 questions, not difficult to answer, major revisions
oct. 17, 2021 revision submitted
oct. 18, 2021 accepted
In an era when the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly slowed down the processing speed of manuscripts, the handling by editor Sylvain Achelle was truly impressive, very timely, and the reviewers also reviewed the manuscript quickly. Thumbs up!

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started