WJWyyds2023 2023-07-28

The editor replied to your email. The number of reviewers giving feedback is the same as the number of reviewers. I got accepted for 2 papers. This journal is quite fast.

zoroooooo 2023-06-28

20230525 submitted
20230526 with editor
20230601 in peer review
20230614 major revision
20230620 revision submitted
20230627 accept

ICF submission transferred to DT as per suggestion, with both reviewers requesting minor revisions. There were a total of eight comments, with no major issues, only a modification to one data figure. The overall process was quick, and it took approximately one month from transfer to acceptance.

qkdxxg 2023-06-27

Receive DOI three days after before and after three months.

qkdxxg 2023-05-27

4.1-4.13: With editor
4.14-5.30: In peer review
5.30: Major revision
6.13: Submitted
6.24: Accept

qingbai 2023-05-18

May I ask how to know if there is any delay in receiving feedback from the reviewer after the repair? Should I inquire with the editorial department?

qingbai 2023-05-18

May I ask how to determine the number of reviewers for return repairs?

满天星1111 2023-05-17

R: Yes, it is sent to the corresponding author.

qkdxxg 2023-05-17

But it seems like I don't have a track link T T. Is this sent to the corresponding author's email?

满天星1111 2023-05-16

Translation: "I would like to ask, since submitting version 4.1, it has already been sent for external review three times... It has been bouncing between editing and reviewers' hands... Is it because we can't find reviewers?"

Response: "You can check the changes in the number of assigned reviewers and the quantity of review comments in the track link. This should help determine whether there is an increase in reviewers or if it is due to not finding reviewers."

qkdxxg 2023-05-16

I would like to ask, the manuscript submitted on April 1st has been sent for external review three times already... It keeps bouncing between editing and reviewers' hands... Is it because we cannot find any reviewers?

qingbai 2023-05-16

Okay, thank you for clarifying, bro.

满天星1111 2023-05-15

You can directly contact Dalton's official email for this situation, as they handle it quickly. I also encountered a similar situation with Dalton, where I didn't receive the Proof email, so I asked them to resend it.

白格 2023-05-15

Oh, mine has been a week already. I hope I didn't delete it in the trash bin. Should I send an email to ask the editor?

满天星1111 2023-05-15

Required: License to publish, it was received the next day. If the option to submit the accepted manuscript for online publication is chosen, it will be online very soon. The proof will take approximately 8-15 days (based on two previous experiences).

满天星1111 2023-05-15

required: license to publish, received the next day, once sent, it will be online. Proof will take approximately 8-15 days.

白格 2023-05-15

I would like to ask if the original poster has received the required: licence to publish email and proof email?

武力 2023-05-15

I want to ask about after being accepted, the editor said they would quickly send an email asking me to submit the publication license for my article, but it's been a week and I still haven't received the "Required: Licence to Publish" email. Usually, these kinds of emails come quickly, right? Should I send an email to the journal editor to inquire about this situation? Or does this journal always send the "Required: Licence to Publish" email slowly?

满天星1111 2023-05-13

You can find out who your assigned associate editor is by clicking on the link "Track" to check the progress of your manuscript. Once you have found their personal email, you can send them an email.

qingbai 2023-05-12

May I ask how to contact the editor? Is dalton<dalton@rsc.org> the email address?

qingbai 2023-05-12

May I ask how to contact the editor? Is it this email address, dalton<dalton@rsc.org>?

满天星1111 2023-05-02

13-Nov-2021 Submitted,
30-Nov-2021 decision,
Returned review comments in 17 days, very fast. There were two reviewers, the first reviewer acknowledged the novelty and significance of the work. The second reviewer raised 4 questions.
06-Dec-2021, revised version returned in one week. The editor only sent it to the second reviewer.
15-Dec-2021 accept.
The entire process from submission to acceptance took only 1 month, very fast.

满天星1111 2023-05-02

3 reviewers, the first reviewer affirmed the originality but rejected the submission. The second and third reviewers suggested major revisions. The editor rejected the submission for resubmission.

After 20 days of revision, resubmission.

The reviewers remained the same. Only the two reviewers with the sharpest questions were selected. After 4 days with the editor, acceptance was received after 15 days.

Although the process was somewhat convoluted, the outcome was good.

Many thanks to Professor Maarit Karppinen for her prompt handling of the manuscript. When I first submitted, I encountered a situation where the reviewers did not provide feedback. I emailed the editor, and it was promptly resolved.

Wishing Dalton continued success.

Nano-Xman 2023-01-05

20220315 submission - Submitted on March 15, 2022
20220317 with editor - Under review by the editor on March 17, 2022
20220322 in peer review - Under peer review on March 22, 2022
20220516 major revision - Requires major revisions on May 16, 2022
20220613 accepted - Accepted on June 13, 2022
DT IF常年在4以上，老牌期刊，有1个审稿人没有反馈耽误了近1个月，有很多论文从投稿到录用只要1-2个月，RSC处理稿件的速度很快。有点创新，题材受众广就有机会。- The journal has a consistently high impact factor of 4 or above and has been established for a long time. However, there was a delay of nearly 1 month due to one reviewer not providing feedback. Many papers are accepted within 1-2 months from submission. The RSC (Royal Society of Chemistry) processes manuscripts quickly. It has some innovative aspects and covers a wide range of topics, providing opportunities for a broad audience.

G.L. 2022-11-24

November 14th, submit
November 15th, in peer review
Currently still under review, hoping for acceptance.

菜菜菜鸟 2022-11-07

The review process is very fast, with two reviewers.
September 21st - Submission
October 4th - Major revision
October 26th - Revised manuscript returned
November 7th - Accepted

涂强子 2022-11-01

Did your article win?

queershanren 2022-10-18

It's been a bit slow recently.
2022-9-19 Submitted
2022-9-20 In peer review
It shows that there is still one reviewer who hasn't provided feedback. The editorial office is no longer pushing for the manuscript, and no one has reminded about the expiration.

fz 2022-10-17

Everyone in the comment section received their repairs very quickly, but it has been 13 days since I sent mine for repair, and there is still no progress.

小李是科研狗！ 2022-09-23

35 days of major repairs, two repairs and one rejection for major repairs, submit after completion and receive within 12 days.

tontein 2022-09-15

Submission Experience:
8.10 - Submitted
8.11 - Under review by the editor
8.19 - Under peer review
8.31 - Requires major revision
9.9 - Revised version submitted
9.13 - Accepted