laughkid 2023-07-23

First review, 7 months, major revisions. The speed of this review is acceptable! I don't plan to submit again.

咪咕咕 2023-03-23

Hello, may I ask why the PDF generated after uploading the LaTeX file is garbled?

Apple2625 2023-03-11

Overall, it is not bad, the first article during the master's period. It seems that one of the reviewers is from South Africa, and the feedback given, overall, was not too difficult to modify. It was accepted after only one revision.

kkowalskii 2022-05-02

Does it have to be in LaTeX format?

GreenEli 2021-10-28

From submission to the first review feedback, it took about 2 months. The first reviewer simply rejected it for the sake of rejection, and their feedback was not valuable. Another reviewer provided me with major revisions, giving very professional and insightful suggestions, which were also the points I had focused on before submitting the paper. However, in the end, it was rejected by the editor. The difficulty of submission was beyond my expectations.

JCR 2021-09-26

It's you again. It's already September, any updates? Has the result of the first trial come out?

smilesgly 2021-07-15

Just for the record, I have submitted three articles:
Submitted one on 7/13, with editor on 7/14.
Submitted two on 7/14, with editor on 7/15.