dudupipi 2023-07-24

On July 24th, the status remains as 6.19 with the editor.

KING001 2023-07-20

The article is about battery technology. It was a very pleasant experience submitting it. The reviewers were very professional, and the editors were also nice. The initial review result was available after one month, and it took another half a month to receive the revised manuscript. This year, the impact factor is 13. I hope the journal will continue to improve in the future!

asdf66616 2023-07-17

Bro, I encountered the same problem. Can you please tell me how you dealt with it in the end?

az111 2023-07-13

Did the results come out?

shpherd 2023-07-09

Has it been finally submitted for review?

dudupipi 2023-06-27

6.15 Revision submitted
6.19 With Editor

Translation:

6.15 Revisión enviada
6.19 Con el editor

Hanker 2023-06-12

I hope to be notified in a timely manner, so as not to delay finding a new job...

a斗 2023-06-12

I also went directly from "with editor" to "decision in process," and I am scared.

Hanker 2023-06-11

6.4 submitted
6.6 with editor
6.10 decision in process
Can I ask how long does it usually take for a paper to be rejected after submission?

未来的小胖博士 2023-06-09

Cement composite material circle
Submitted on April 20th
The editor sent it for review after a week, but no reviewer accepted the submission within 14 days.
On May 10th, the date changed, which means the editor sent it for review again.
So far, there is still no reviewer who accepted the submission, and the date has not changed either. Should I send an email to the editor to remind them about this situation?

我就改个名字 2023-05-22

4.28 Submission
5.1 Under review
5.22 With editor
Please help me analyze what this situation is?

MiMi李 2023-05-22

Excuse me, did the editor reply to you? Mine is the editor who invited 9 people, but I haven't received the manuscript review yet.

鲤鱼王desu 2023-05-17

I am placed at the end, but I see some pre-printed ones placed in the middle, feeling that the format is relatively loose.

MiMi李 2023-05-16

My manuscript was sent to 16 potential reviewers in two rounds, taking two months. However, only one reviewer accepted and completed the review one month ago. Based on this situation, will the editor be frustrated and lead to rejection due to the inability to find reviewers? Thank you all.

SH 2023-05-11

Thank you, bro. The figures and tables are placed below the reference list. First, the figure with its title, then the tables with their captions, haha.

我就改个名字 2023-05-11

The pictures are placed after the main text, and less important ones are placed in the supplementary materials.

SH 2023-05-11

May I ask where the figure in part b of the manuscript should be placed? Should it be placed after the main text or within the main text? Or should it be uploaded separately?

SH 2023-05-11

Where should the images in the manuscript be placed? After the main text or within the main text? Or do they need to be uploaded separately?

DDWB 2023-05-04

Can't I just write directly to the editor-in-chief?

Lalala_2022 2023-05-04

Already numb, I've been urging for three months, but they haven't sent any new ones.

haida 2023-05-02

2022-12-01 Submitted to Journal
2022-12-03 With Editor
2023-02-01 Under Review
2023-02-21 Major Revision
2023-03-10 Submitted Revision
2023-03-10 With Editor
2023-03-12 With Editor
2023-03-15 With Editor
2023-04-24 Decision in Process
2023-04-25 Minor Revision
2023-04-26 Submitted Revision
2023-04-26 With Editor
2023-04-29 Accept

MiMi李 2023-05-02

Excuse me, editor, have you invited anyone else to review the manuscript? Thank you, and I hope everything is going well for you.

dabing0212 2023-04-30

May I ask which editor was chosen when submitting the contribution?

dudupipi 2023-04-26

4.25 Major Revision: Difficult to answer, 5 reviewers.

ymz416 2023-04-22

"The editor is too slow."

Lalala_2022 2023-04-20

Must hurry, otherwise the editor may easily forget. Even though I've urged the editor, there hasn't been much response.

Taylor26 2023-04-19

After the submission of Comp B, a dedicated link will be sent to the corresponding author's email. Another method is to follow the official account of Elsevier Research Publishing Services on WeChat, go to the "Assistance for Manual Submission" section, and provide the submission number to inquire about the progress of the review. The response time during working days is quite prompt, so you can give it a try.

zzr 2023-04-19

The editing efficiency is very high, and it was submitted for review within two days. However, during the Chinese New Year period, some reviewers did not accept the review, which delayed the time. There were a total of four reviewers, and the feedback raised professional questions. After the response, it was accepted within ten days.

ben 2023-04-17

Is it still necessary to modify and resubmit this kind of opinion to the editor? "You have the option of resubmitting a substantially revised version of your paper, which would be considered as a new submission. If you decide to do this, you should refer to the reference number of the current paper and include a cover letter which explains in detail how the paper has been changed or not, in reply to the Editor and Reviewer comments."

zhangfeizhi 2023-04-17

How many days did you take to submit for review?