Verified Reviews - COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

凶巴巴 2022-11-30

The repetition rate does not exceed 20%.

smartboy 2022-11-04

5.24 submit;
5.25 with editor;
6.6 with editor;
6.14 under review;
6.14 agreed with reviewer;
6.15 agreed with reviewer;
6.25 comments returned;
6.29 comments returned;
7.1 decision in process;
7.20 major revision;
8.24 R1 - with editor;
8.26 under review;
9.3 first revision completed;
9.19 second revision completed;
9.20 decision in process;
9.26 major revision;
10.4 R2 submit;
10.11 under review;
10.20 comments returned;
10.28 comments returned;
10.30 decision in process;
10.30 accepted.

The first submission raised many detailed and professional questions that were not previously considered in the paper. The response was nearly 30 pages long and addressed many sharp questions, which were not easy to answer. Thankfully, there were enough references to support the response, and it was considered satisfactory. The second submission also raised several detailed questions, and the response was over 10 pages long. It feels like the two responses are more exciting than the main body of the paper.

小李子000 2022-10-02

Submitted in early May, it took more than 20 days to be reviewed by the editor. It underwent major revisions at the end of July, and was revised again at the beginning of September. Minor revisions were made in mid-September, and it was accepted at the end of the month. The editing process started off a bit slow, but luckily I was patient enough to wait. Overall, the editing was good, except for a few reviewers who kept nitpicking. Fortunately, the editor remained objective and fair, disregarding the meaningless review comments. The acceptance was smooth~ The submission experience was decent.

大魔王 2022-08-30

Hurry up and submit the manuscript, I will be back after reminding them once.

smartboy 2022-07-13

It should be that the external review experts have not finished reviewing. Some experts may have refused to review or even not responded until the deadline, which slows down the process. It has been over half a month since my first review, and it is still in the "decision in process" stage with no updates. I am not sure if the editor is on vacation or on a business trip.

焦虑患者 2022-07-05

It has been two months, and it has always been under review, but there has been no progress.

紫轩恋雨 2022-05-10

What is the required rate of similarity for this journal? Is it below 20%? The editor rejected it because the similarity rate was a bit high. Before submitting, I checked the similarity using the journal's plagiarism detection software and made the necessary changes. I'm not sure why the similarity rate is still not acceptable. It was not even sent for review, the editor directly rejected it.

紫轩恋雨 2022-05-10

What is the required maximum similarity rate for this journal? Is it 20%? The editor rejected the submission because the similarity rate was a bit high. Before submitting, I checked it using the journal's plagiarism detection software and made the necessary revisions. I'm not sure why the similarity rate is still not satisfactory. It was not even sent for review and the editor rejected it directly.

紫轩恋雨 2022-05-10

What is the required plagiarism rate for this journal? Is it less than 20%? The editor rejected it because the plagiarism rate was a bit high. I checked it with the journal's plagiarism detection software and made the necessary revisions, but I don't know why the plagiarism rate is still not acceptable. It was not even sent for review, the editor rejected it directly.

鲨鱼辣椒本椒 2022-05-08

This journal is considered quite authoritative in the field of cold region research. Compared to non-open access journals, it is relatively fast. The requirements for article quality are quite high. At that time, I was naive and submitted my manuscript without fully understanding the situation. It was rejected in about two months, but the reviewers provided many excellent suggestions. It seems that this journal has a good understanding of researchers in China. They seem to know the authors' focus on cold region engineering research like the back of their hand.

大雄Iwan 2022-04-04

Under review on the third day of submission, the efficiency is very high. I hope everything goes smoothly in the future!

peiyi4315 2022-04-04

The speed is very fast. Submitted in November 2021, there was one major revision in between, and the second revision had very minor issues. Online by early April 2022.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started