深山老鬼 2023-08-04

Because a problem that is not a problem is rejected, even top international journals are very casual.

s110 2023-08-02

Ah, I also transferred over. It has been nearly a month since I joined as an editor. Why is this district journal so slow?

linmo 2023-07-21

Have you made any progress?

yyychh1 2023-07-18

Excuse me, has there been any progress from the friend? My submission has been with the editor for a month now, and I'm not sure whether I should send an email to follow up.

s110 2023-07-09

Also transferred from the Journal of Building Engineering, what is the situation with this journal?

linmo 2023-07-03

According to CCC's own website, if your submission has not exceeded 60 days, you are not allowed to push for it.

黄旺 2023-06-23

The same situation, I submitted it on May 26th, and now it's already June 23rd. There hasn't been any news at all. I don't know what to do or what the original poster's current situation is.

Feketerigo 2023-06-08

My main research direction is composite materials, and I am not very familiar with concrete field journals myself. I collaborated with another teacher at the school who works on concrete-related topics to write an article. The quality of the article is better than Part B standards, and although the experimental data is average, it is highly innovative. Since there are very few concrete-related articles in CST and Part A, my collaborator said that this journal has a great influence in the field of concrete. After looking at the relevant papers in the journal, I feel that it is quite similar. Although neither of us are big names in the industry, we decided to give it a try.

The article was submitted in September last year, and after the initial review, it required major and minor revisions. However, the article went through multiple rounds of revisions and was not accepted until May this year, living up to its reputation of taking about half a year for submission. Actually, the speed of the editors is quite fast. They generally send the manuscript for review within a week of receiving it, and after revisions, it is sent for review again within a week. However, the time given to the reviewers is too ample, taking several months. If you are in a rush to write grants or apply for scholarships, it is advised to be cautious in submitting to this journal. In the end, it did not delay the application time for graduate school, and it seems that the influence of the concrete field is indeed greater than Part B, which can be considered a good result.

李先森 2023-06-04

Recently it's been surprisingly slow. It has been a month with the editor, and I have sent emails to urge, but there has been no response at all. I wonder what the editors have been busy with lately.

jordonjill 2023-06-01

5.18 with editor
6.20 under review
6.29 major revision
7.12 with editor
After the major revision was submitted, there have been no further updates. I wonder if it will be sent for review again.

tumbler 2023-05-28

ccc is better than jbe, it's better to improve towards a higher goal.

wide soil 2023-05-26

Posted on 5.12, it's already 5.26, still with the editor, I wonder if it's going to be rejected, feeling upset.

ZH-1995 2023-05-23

I also transferred from JBE, but I don't feel like I meet the standards of CCC. Is it necessary to wait? Please advise.

静静哭泣 2023-05-16

2023-2-27 Submission
2023-3-7 Under review
2023-4-5 Minor revisions, Reviewer 1 has no comments, Reviewer 2 has several comments, Editor requests minor revisions, deadline is 4.26
Due to being busy with various tasks such as graduation thesis, there was no time for revisions. Requesting a one-week extension for revisions, will return for revisions on 5.1
2023-5-3 Received by the editor, and has been with the editor since then
2023-5-16 Accepted directly.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-05-05

The two research colleagues upstairs, I suggest you can submit it. I have submitted it before, but I feel that the effect is not significant. Later, I voluntarily withdrew the submission, and the next day it was rejected.

无名小辈WMXB 2023-05-05

The situation is exactly the same. Should I remind them?

做个混子 2023-05-03

Translate the following text into English: "with the editor for a month, hesitating whether to send an email to remind them."

无名小辈 2023-04-27

2022.12.17 submit - Submitted on December 17th, 2022.
2022.12.19 with editor - With editor since December 19th, 2022.
2022.12.22 under review - Under review since December 22nd, 2022.
2023.02.26 major revision - Requires major revision by February 26th, 2023.
2023.03.28 submit revision - Revised version submitted on March 28th, 2023.
2023.04.05 accept - Accepted on April 5th, 2023.

Two external reviewers found the innovation to be significant, and after making the necessary modifications, the paper can be published. However, they provided nearly 20 suggestions, some of which were quite challenging.

After making substantial revisions to the language and content of the article within a month, it was quickly accepted.

十sane 2023-04-11

Brother, it has been a year already.

余小默 2023-04-09

It's really slow, and I can only wait.
2022.12.08 Submission
2022.12.17 Under review
2023.04.19 Under review

无尽的拉格朗日 2023-04-07

3.14 Submitted
3.15 With Editor
3.29 Under Review

无所谓惧怕 2023-04-03

Two reviewers provided major revisions, which took half a month to address. Yesterday, I received minor revision comments, one reviewer accepted them, while the other raised two minor questions.

无所谓惧怕 2023-04-03

Personally, I think if there is no rejection, there is a good chance for hope, and the rest is left to time.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-04-01

2023.3.7 submit
2023.4.1 with editor
PS: In fact, the author knows that the article is below the average level of CCC. Three weeks are enough for the editor to handle the quality and plagiarism check of the manuscript. If constructive suggestions can be given in a timely manner, the author can also improve and submit to other journals, striving to graduate soon. Best of luck to everyone who reads this!

小胖博士 2023-03-21

2022.09.27 Submission
2022.10.09 Under Review
2022.11.28 Two reviewers, one major revision and one minor revision
2023.01.04 Sent to one reviewer for second review
2023.01.25 Review completed by one reviewer for second review
2023.01.25 Continued review by second reviewer, 2023.01.29 reviews invitations accepted ongoing
It has been exactly 6 months since submission. Is this situation normal? Is there a chance of acceptance? Should I send an email to the editor?

无所谓惧怕 2023-03-08

Submitted on December 31st, 2022.
Major revision on February 15th, 2023.
The reviewer is very professional and clearly an expert in the field.
The suggestions are not easy to incorporate.

十sane 2023-03-01

Hello, I want to ask, what does it mean when the second reviewer says "please refer to the report"?

十sane 2023-03-01

Hello, I want to ask, what does it mean when the second reviewer says "Please refer to the report"?

User139cw29kn 2023-02-28

2022.10.26 Submission;
2022.11.08 Review started, three reviewers;
2023.01.29 Major revision;
2023.02.17 Revision submitted;
2023.02.26 Accepted.

The journal is excellent with a strong influence in the industry; the editorial process is very prompt, and my manuscript did not stay with the editor for as long as rumored online; the reviewers are very professional, their questions are pertinent and profound, and they have been very helpful for further research.

Best wishes to all colleagues who have submitted or are preparing to submit their manuscripts!

深山老鬼 2023-02-16

2023-2-14: Complete view
2023-2-15: Under review