Verified Reviews - ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

sunnyxxq 2022-01-15

Submitted on September 8th, received first review comments on September 30th, given two months for major revisions. One reviewer provided mild comments, while the other raised 14 questions, most of which required additional experiments. Revised version was submitted on November 22nd, and after the second review on December 7th, minor revisions were requested. The reviewers were satisfied with the revised manuscript, but two new questions were raised, and some small experiments were added. Revised version was submitted on January 4th. On January 14th, it was notified that the paper would be accepted in principle, but it required proofreading. The editor offered free modifications to the abstract and title, and final acceptance is pending after proofreading. Overall, the reviewers' comments significantly improved the paper, and the efficiency of the journal is high. It is a reputable journal among domestic publications, with promising prospects.

lszy 2021-09-14

I would like to ask if there is a page fee for this magazine? After it is accepted, how long does it take to be searchable online?

meiyounicheng123 2021-04-05

Old-established magazines have always had high standards. IF has always been continuously increasing. Its influence is definitely growing. The future prospects are very promising.

ritsu 2021-03-23

Submit it for revisions for a month, and after a month, revise and directly accept it.

It's okay, the quality of the article is acceptable. It's not good to submit without a certain amount of data.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now