Verified Reviews - CATENA
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

涛涛505 2023-08-09

4.17 Under review translates to "4.17 is currently being reviewed."
8.9 Under review translates to "8.9 is currently being reviewed."

mmw 2023-07-30

7.30 Still Editor Assigned

herunze 2023-07-28

Oh my, it's really tough. It's been almost a month and we still have only "reviewers invited".

mmw 2023-07-14

2023.6.19 submitted to journal
2023.6.21 editor assigned
2023.7.7 editor assigned
2023.7.12 editor assigned
......
So slow

WYQ2626 2023-07-12

From submission to acceptance, it took about three and a half months. The initial review process took about two and a half months, during which the editor kept inviting reviewers, so the "under review" status in the system kept changing. Finally, the two reviewers provided their comments on time. The overall feedback was relatively positive, and the editor gave three weeks for revisions. After timely resubmission without external review, the editor accepted it directly after about ten days. Overall, it was good, and I wish everyone a smooth submission process!

yo你一生一世 2023-07-11

After rejection, resubmission is required. May I ask the experts, what is the required plagiarism detection rate for this journal?

奎阁高香 2023-07-11

The second submission to Catena was accepted, after a review process that took nearly 6 months, mainly because I took a long time to submit. Overall, the review speed was still acceptable. The first round of review comments was received approximately 1 month after submission, with one minor revision and one moderate revision. The editor-in-chief allowed 21 days for revisions. Due to other commitments, I requested an extension. The second round of review took about a month as well, resulting in one acceptance and one acceptance after minor revisions suggested by the editor-in-chief.

This year, the impact factor is 6.2, which is quite stable. I hope Catena will continue to improve.

hehe2333323 2023-07-11

2023-07-07 Reminder for manuscript submission
2023-07-10 Invitations for review(s) have been sent. Please continue to wait for further updates.

Victor奇奇 2023-07-10

2023.6.24 Submitted to journal
2023.6.27 Editor Assigned
2023.7.7 Reject
reject: Although your results are potentially interesting, the subject matter of your manuscript is not within the scope of this journal. Please refer to the journal's homepage for an overview of the Aims & Scope. We hope you will consider submitting future studies that align with the journal's scope.

混子G 2023-07-10

After more than 20 days of submission, the status remained unchanged. Then a letter was sent to urge the submission. Two days later, it was sent for review. Two reviewers accepted the review. After a period of time, additional reviewers were invited. In total, four reviewers accepted the review. On the morning of July 8, 2023, one reviewer submitted their review comments, and immediately the status changed to "Review completed by reviewers". Shortly after, on the same day in the evening, the editor-in-chief rejected the manuscript, stating that it did not fit within the scope of the journal, without providing any feedback to the reviewers.

辣条哥 2023-06-28

2023-06-25 revisión importante

辣条哥 2023-06-28

Excuse me, boss, may I ask who is the editor of your article?

芷卉 2023-06-28

The manuscript was under review for two months, but the editor rejected it claiming a lack of reviewers. It feels like a slippery situation, so proceed with caution.

雨落凡尘 2023-06-27

2023.04.22 Submitted
2023.04.24 Editor assigned
2023.04.25 Reviewers invited - 5 reviewers invited
2023.05.01 Under Review - 4 additional reviewers invited, 2 agreed to review
2023.05.26 One reviewer completed the review
2023.05.31 Invited 4 more reviewers, 1 agreed to review
2023.06.06 Required Reviews Completed
2023.06.08 Moderate Revision - Received feedback from 2 reviewers, given 20 days to make revisions
2023.06.26 With Editor
2023.06.27 Editor assigned+Accept - Revised version accepted without further review.

hehe2333323 2023-06-19

The speed is indeed not very fast. Let's see how the status changes behind.

破风 2023-06-19

I also applied in June, and from the 6th until today, I am still in the evaluation process. I'm quite speechless.

hehe2333323 2023-06-18

First time submitting to this journal. Just submitted it a moment ago. Heard it's very slow. Just wanted to share with everyone the preliminary status change. I don't even know what it means myself.
Initially submitted to AGEE, but it didn't meet the requirements. The system recommended another journal to transfer the submission.
2023-06-01 submitted
2023-06-05 editor assigned
2023-06-16 editor assigned
...............

24March 2023-06-16

What happened next, may I ask?

24March 2023-06-16

Brother, I have seen your figure in many soil-related places. I want to ask if it is fast to reject the catena? I want to try it in the next area.

辣条哥 2023-06-02

On June 2, 2023, another reviewer provided feedback, and the status changed from "Under Review" to "RRC." The editor hopes for an opportunity.

辣条哥 2023-06-02

According to the track link of the corresponding author's email, it shows the number of invited reviewers and the number of experts who accepted the review.

辣条哥 2023-06-02

Under Review means that it has been submitted for review, but it does not necessarily mean that experts have accepted the invitation for peer review.

LD-200 2023-06-01

How to view inviting a few reviewers, how to view no one accepting the review.

韩朔 2023-05-30

Doesn't "under review" mean that the manuscript has already been assigned to a reviewer? Why does it say that no one has accepted the review?

辣条哥 2023-05-29

2023.05.29 A reviewer has returned his comments.

Fldfcahbs 2023-05-24

Is it normal that the submission made last night has not reached the editor's hands by tonight?

辣条哥 2023-05-22

2023.05.14 One reviewer accepts the review.
2023.05.16 A total of 4 people accept the review.
Hope to receive a major revision.

辣条哥 2023-05-22

I don't know, CATENA is indeed quite slow.

dfbsjfwkbf 2023-05-19

Is it normal for the second review to take more than three months? During this period, the status has been switching between "reviews invited" and "under review."

tom 2023-05-13

My editor has been assigned for several days.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started