Verified Reviews - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

JIM-XIANFEN 2023-06-13

I have been waiting for a month and I am still in the "reviewers assigned" stage.

jojoDuan 2023-03-17

Hello, how is your thesis going?

Roderick 2022-12-20

Dec 15, 2022, New submission
I don't know how efficient this magazine is. The official website says that the average time to receive the initial review results is 45 days.

LizzyQiao 2022-08-09

Hello, may I ask if the revised draft needs to separate the text and images? Or can I just insert the images into the corresponding positions in the main text, just like when submitting the article? Thank you.

LizzyQiao 2022-08-09

Hello, may I ask if the revised draft needs to separate the images and place them individually or if they can be directly inserted into the corresponding positions? Thank you!

寒鸦微凉 2022-02-07

2021 5.22 Submission
2021 11.02 Received comments from external reviewers, a total of three reviewers, with a long review period. Sent multiple emails to the editorial department to urge the review.
2021 11.17 Submitted revised manuscript
2022 1.25 Accepted

张大亮 2021-12-31

11.28 Submission
12.7 Under review
12.14--Currently Under review

蔡小帅 2021-12-31

The manuscript was initially submitted to ES, and after major revisions, four reviewers agreed to accept it, but one reviewer rejected it. The editor also rejected it.
After careful revision, it was resubmitted to Bulletin. The following is the submission record:
8.20 Submitted; 8.21 Editor Assigned; Editor invited;
8.22 Reviewer assigned, under review; 8.28 Under review; 10.12 Editor Assigned; 11.9 Reviewer assigned;
11.10 Under review, 11.20 Under review; 12.17 Editor Assigned; 12.20 Editor Assigned, 12.20 Under review; 12.31 Accepted
The journal handled the manuscript quickly, and the editor was responsible. The reviewers were scholars who performed relatively well in the field, and most of their suggestions were constructive. They were strict but provided opportunities for revision, resulting in two rounds of acceptance.
We hope the journal will continue to improve.

Dream on the way 2021-11-27

The journal has a high influence in the field of earthquake engineering. The questions raised by the two reviewers are of high quality, and their suggestions greatly contribute to improving the paper.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search