canghao 2023-07-23

May I ask how you became so indifferent?

侯炳旭 2023-07-19

Submission date: 2023.5.2
Currently, two submissions have been made. One has already been reviewed, but the third person is still in the process of reviewing it.

论文不能停 2023-07-12

Jul 12, 2023 With Editor

论文不能停 2023-07-11

Jul 11, 2023 Submitted to Journal

ddxt 2023-07-11

Is this journal only in the revise state? Are there no major or minor revisions?

gazi 2023-06-27

May I ask if this journal has a submission template? Thank you.

J-a-d-e 2023-03-13

2022.10.20 submitted - Submitted on October 20, 2022.
2022.11.01 with editor - Under the editor's review on November 1, 2022.
2022.11.09 under review - Under review since November 9, 2022. (It took about half a month from submission to review, and the editor is very serious. There was a previous experience of rejection at this step.)
2022.11.23 revise - Revision requested on November 23, 2022. (Two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision.)
2022.11.29 submitted - Submitted again on November 29, 2022.
2022.12.15 under review - Under review since December 15, 2022. (Possibly slower due to the Christmas holiday.)
2023.12.23 required reviews complete - Required reviews completed on December 23, 2023.
2023.12.28 revise - Revision requested on December 28, 2023.
2023.01.08 submitted - Submitted again on January 8, 2023.
2023.01.10 decision in process - Decision process ongoing since January 10, 2023. (It took one month.)
2023.02.09 accept - Accepted on February 9, 2023.

Fortunately, the journal was still in the second quartile (BE) when submitted, but it was upgraded to the first quartile after acceptance.

你的名字我的故事 2023-03-07

2022.10.15 submitted
2022.10.19 with editor
2022.10.28 with editor
2022.11.02 under review
2022.11.11 reviewer 1 completed
2022.12.02 under review (invited reviewers, no response for a month)
2023.01.05 under review (sent a reminder email, updated on the same day, invited reviewers)
2023.01.31 under review (second reviewer accepted invitation)
2023.02.27 reviewer 2 completed
2023.03.06 decision reject

Perhaps my method is not very common, and many reviewers do not accept it. The two reviewers who finally accepted did not provide feedback on my method. They may not understand it well. Overall, the speed is still acceptable, and the efficiency of sending reminder emails is high. I may consider submitting to this journal again next time.

ISHAK 2022-06-29

May I ask if there is any news on your article? How long does it usually take for it to be reviewed?

853007793@qq.com 2022-06-28

Congratulations on reaching an impact factor of 5 in 2022.

redaiyulin 2022-05-11

2022.4.27 Submitted to journal
2022.5.1 With Editor

Until now, it is still "With Editor". What can the outcome be? Will it be accepted or rejected for review?

xgdw 2022-05-03

How long does it take for the review? What field are you working in?

xibeixincheng 2022-05-02

Two reviewers provided feedback, which doesn't seem to be a major issue, only minor issues. However, the editor-in-chief rejected the submission. Frustrated.

xq1996 2022-04-18

The editor is very responsible and will help with grammar revisions. Submitted on October 27, 2021, for major revisions in January 2022, revised in March, and accepted directly in April.

aki-Emma 2021-12-01

After one month of editing after submission, it was sent for external review for three months, and after four months, it was rejected. The editing suggestions were very detailed, even changing the spelling of a few words.

酒酒无憾 2021-11-13

Feb 09, 2021 Submission
Apr 25, 2021 Revision, both reviewers' comments were relatively positive, and the editor gave a revise decision. It is unclear whether it requires major or minor revisions. Carefully revise the article.
May 09, 2021 Submitting the revised results
Jun 09, 2021 Acceptance, no further revisions were made. After one round of revisions, the manuscript was returned to the two original reviewers, who were very satisfied with the modifications and agreed to accept it directly.
This journal has been submitted twice. The previous time it took two months for the review process. One reviewer requested minor revisions, while the other reviewer rejected the manuscript. The editor gave a rejection decision and then it was submitted to a journal with a higher impact factor, which accepted it.
The journal editor's handling time was still quite fast. When the first review was completed, the decision in process status lasted for a week, and I thought it was going to be a tragedy. However, the editor decided to revise the manuscript.

xq1996 2021-09-22

From submission to rejection took two months, which is considered acceptable in terms of efficiency. Both reviewers and the associate editor provided very constructive comments. Overall, the editor was very responsible and provided me with many useful suggestions for my paper.

酒酒无 2021-06-13

Feb 09, 2021 Manuscript submission
Apr 25, 2021 Revisions, both reviewers' comments were relatively positive, and the editor gave a revise decision, but it is unknown whether it is major or minor revisions. Carefully revise the article.
May 09, 2021 Return the revised results
Jun 09, 2021 Acceptance, no further revisions were made, the revisions were sent back to the two original reviewers, and they were both satisfied with the revisions and agreed to accept the article directly.
This journal has been submitted twice before. The previous review took two months, with one reviewer suggesting minor revisions and the other rejecting the submission. The editor gave a rejection decision and then transferred the submission to a journal with a higher impact factor for acceptance.
The journal editor's handling time was still very fast. When the first review was completed, the "decision in process" status lasted for a week, and it was thought that it would be a tragedy. However, the editor gave a revise decision.

于博 2021-04-15

Can you please provide the template for submitting the word version of Biosystem Engineering?

汽水的橘子 2021-04-11

May I ask what happened to this paper in the end, Nan?

Faker 2021-04-07

After one and a half months of initial review, the editor decided to reject the submission. Both reviewers had only minor issues with the manuscript. The editor claimed that the content of the article does not align well with the journal. It's ridiculous that they took so long to reject it, especially after two months of review. This journal is really strange. Be cautious when submitting to it!