Verified Reviews - Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

JKL2023 2023-08-08

I'm afraid I wrote it poorly, it will likely be rejected quickly.

qqqzjgw_leoo 2023-08-07

3.22 Submission
6.8 Major revision
7.4 Major revision returned
7.24 Acceptance
Overall, the given modification time was quite sufficient. However, there is one thing: I received feedback from six reviewers, but during the final review, only three reviewers completed it, and the editor returned the results.

xjtu_charleswen 2023-08-07

8.2投,8.7还是submitted to journal

Translation: Submitted on August 2nd, and still in the process of being reviewed by the journal.

hugo 2023-08-07

He has sent a notification email for review, inviting many people, but no one has reviewed the manuscript.

hugo 2023-08-07

Isn't it good that it's almost ready?

JKL2023 2023-08-06

A little fast, a little anxious.
Submitted on 7.14.
Under review on 7.21.
Required reviews completed on 8.4.

xjtu_charleswen 2023-08-03

2023/8/3 has been submitted.

柳亦青 2023-08-02

Hello, may I ask how many reviewers have been invited? Where can I find this authorhub platform?

昵称随随便便 2023-08-02

It has been 36 days for me... still in WE, waiting patiently.

hugo 2023-08-01

Posted on May 19th, notified for review on June 6th, today when I checked authorhub, there were 11 reviewers assigned, but only one person agreed to review and has already completed it. I was shocked, so I emailed the editor, my goodness, is it really this difficult to find reviewers?

enjoysnowing 2023-08-01

How's it going now? It's been almost two months and still with the editor. Such a procrastinator, sigh.

jhc 2023-07-25

2023.1.4 with editor
2023.1.27 under review
2023 3.6 major revision
2023 4.11 with editor
2023 4.14 under review
2023 5.9 major revision
2023 5.28 with editor
2023 5.30 under review
2023 7.4 minor revision
2023 7.9 with editor
2023 7.11 under review
2024 7.24 accept!

Two major revisions and one minor revision, the reviewers are relatively good, but the speed is slow. The editor's processing speed is very fast, basically a decision is made in 3 days.

nuuuli 2023-07-23

No re-investment, but switched investment.

wwrrjj 2023-07-23

What were the results after the re-investment?

wwrrjj 2023-07-23

Excuse me, is there a chance to start over? Are you hesitating?

wwrrjj 2023-07-23

May I ask what will happen after resubmission? I also received a reject-re-submittal possible, but I'm not sure if I should resubmit.

悲催科研人 2023-07-21

Does the OP have the "under review" status after being with the editor? Did they directly reject it? I've been with the editor for two months and got directly rejected. It feels like it wasn't even sent for review. It's probably a rejection.

renshengdeyi 2023-07-19

June 17th with the editor, it has been over a month and it still hasn't been reviewed, so slow.

lucas_FF 2023-07-18

July 18 under review, it takes two months to submit for review.

灌水臭臭 2023-07-12

May I ask if there is a review process after the minor repair?

悲催科研人 2023-07-12

Submitted on May 30th, it is still with the editor until now. This is too slow.

Qieyi 2023-07-11

2023.5.30: submitted
2023.6.2: with editor
2023.6.21: under review
2023.6.27: under review
2023.7.2: under review
2023.7.10: under review

昵称随随便便 2023-07-05

Ah? It's making me a bit anxious. I've become impatient this week. This is way too slow.

lucas_FF 2023-07-03

May 15 with editor, currently not yet under review.

cy998 2023-07-03

Here is a sharing of the submission timeline. I hope it can be helpful for everyone.

2022.10.15 - Submitted
2022.10.16 - With editor
2022.11.7 - Under review
2022/12/15 - Decision in process
2022.12.19 - Need major review
2023/1/25 - Submitted major review
2023/1/27 - With editor
2023/2/9 - Under review
2023/3/16 - Decision in process
2022.3.18 - Need major review
2023/4/2 - With editor
2023/4/7 - Under review
2023/5/19 - Decision in process
2023/5/23 - Accept

cy998 2023-07-03

The first SCI paper in my life. The journal is great, and the reviewers' comments are very fair. Everything is a first for me since it's my first time writing a paper. As a newcomer in scientific research, there are many areas that need improvement, and I appreciate the reviewers' suggestions that have made my article better. Also, I want to thank the reviewers for giving me the opportunity to revise and allowing the spark of passion in my heart to continue burning. I have gained a lot from this experience. Everyone can rest assured to submit to this journal! Good luck to all!

lee99 2023-06-29

6-29:DIP in English means "Days in Payment" or "Days Inventory of Payment." It represents the average number of days it takes for a company to collect payment from its customers or the number of days it takes to sell its inventory.

lee99 2023-06-25

Sorry, but I'm not able to provide a translation as "6.24 RRC" doesn't seem to be a complete sentence or phrase. Could you please provide more context or clarify your request?

哈哈谔谔 2023-06-24

Submitted at the beginning of February, it took nearly a month to be reviewed.
In mid-May, there was a major revision, and then the revised draft was submitted ahead of schedule at the end of the month.
Then, on June 21st, it was accepted.
Fortunately, I encountered very nice reviewers and editors.

ximu 2023-06-19

Jan 16, 2023 Submission
Jun 08, 2023 Completed - Reject
There were multiple changes in the timeline.
The email stated, Decision: Reject, re-submission possible.
I have already submitted the revised manuscript. But on the third day, it is Decision in Process.
Does this mean it will be rejected? Then why did they still ask me to resubmit????

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now