Verified Reviews - BIOMATERIALS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

生物材料@Biomaterials 2023-08-07

This magazine is bound to die by its own hands sooner or later. It is too slow, taking at least two months in the editor's hands before being submitted for review. Although it took six months of struggle to finally be accepted, I really dare not consider investing in it as a priority in the future.

Mr R 2023-06-02

22 March Submitted
1 Jun Accepted
Biomaterials has been speeding up the review process, after all, the reputation of top journals should not be affected by delays in speed.
I hope Biomaterials will continue to improve and wish you all good luck!

Frank's 2023-05-19

Most people take a long time to review, why is your review cycle so fast?

hayward 2023-05-12

22.11.1投稿 - 22nd November 1st submission
23.2.12接受 - 23rd February 12th acceptance

雨天天好 2023-04-03

I suggest not submitting to this journal, it's a bit trashy. It's not good in all aspects. The review process takes at least 2 months to start...

遇见飞 2023-04-03

On April 3, 2023, I was rejected by the editor after waiting for 50 days. My submission was rejected due to the template issue, which caused a delay of two months. It truly hurts, and I have decided not to submit or refer to this journal in the future!!

oneoneone 2023-04-02

Did you remind them? Still no news?

LUPOC 2023-03-29

Submitted in January, it has been "with editor" all this time. Neither rejected nor sent for review, it has been left with the editor to ferment. I'm truly speechless!

LUPOC 2023-03-29

Submitted in January, it is still "with editor" until now, neither rejected nor under review. Speechless.

cqmuch 2023-03-28

May I ask if there is any update on the status?

生物材料@Biomaterials 2023-03-27

This afternoon finally went through the review, it has been 53 days since submission.

汪先生 2023-03-27

56 days after submission, the official template was rejected.

zzz萌 2023-03-22

I submitted it on February 4th, and it is still with the editor. I sent a letter to follow up after a month, but it was still with the editor. I haven't received any response to my reminder emails. I really regret submitting it.

生物材料@Biomaterials 2023-03-22

It seems that I will have to wait longer for the submission I made on February 2nd. Is this magazine intentionally trying to give me a hard time? The experience of submitting my work has been extremely poor.

汪先生 2023-03-22

3.22日 still with editor

遇见飞 2023-03-18

Will you reply after urging? How do you reply?

光富 2023-03-17

With the editor for over 40 days, but still not sent for review. I've reminded them once, but it doesn't seem to work. How can a magazine like this exist?

oneoneone 2023-03-14

Did you submit it for review?

遇见飞 2023-03-08

14 Feb 2023 With Editor
Still With Editor until now

At this speed, it's not guaranteed to be reviewed even after waiting for a month.

汪先生 2023-03-08

I submitted it in January, and it is still "with editor" until now. I'm so frustrated, I have to wait another week.

zzz萌 2023-03-06

I submitted it a month ago and it's still with the editor. I have already sent an email to urge them. It's really too slow, isn't it?

做最好的自己123 2023-03-01

In the future, I will not submit or recommend this journal. I strongly criticize the fact that it took 50 days with the editor without being sent for review, wasting the authors' time!

遇见飞 2023-02-20

Where did you invest the other 10%?

遇见飞 2023-02-20

How is it going? Has it been reviewed yet?

做最好的自己123 2023-02-10

This journal is really slow, it's better to submit directly to the well-established biomaterials journal Acta Biomaterialia.

xlq要努力呀 2023-01-31

Submitted 12.24
With editor 1.31
It has been a month and the editor has not yet processed the manuscript. The journal is really slow. I should have known to submit to CEJ earlier.

cyanine 2023-01-26

23.1.26 Under Review is another long wait. On the fifth day of the Lunar New Year, we welcome the God of Wealth, hoping that BM can become the first "treasure" of the year.

pingesam 2023-01-23

I would like to ask, how many reviewers are currently required for "required reviews completed"? The track submission webpage shows that two people have already completed the review, but the status is still "under review". However, for our previous submission, it was marked as "required reviews completed" with two reviewer comments.

oneoneone 2022-12-29

Where did you vote?

咩小力 2022-12-27

The submission was rejected after 45 days without review. It has been with the editor all this time, and the rejection email mentioned that there is a backlog of manuscripts, so they urgently need articles and cannot afford any delays. Currently, it has been submitted to another journal with an impact factor of 10+, and it was reviewed within three days.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now