Verified Reviews - LAND USE POLICY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

顺利毕业aaa 2023-07-21

Yes, it is indeed because there was Chinese involved, such as translating the website into Chinese. The system did not recognize it properly, and as a result, the PDF generated with Chinese was unacceptable and got rejected.

OKC-KD 2023-06-10

Excuse me, OP, how did you solve the problem posted by the editor? I also encountered the same issue, specifically, what needs to be changed?

桐老师 2023-05-29

20230522 submitting
20230524 Return and revise the format, and resubmit the recommended reviewers
20230525 with editor

arcpy 2023-05-23

You can send a system email to the responsible editor to inquire about the specific status of the manuscript.

疯狂的兔子会receive 2023-05-22

It has been two months, still "With Editor".

arcpy 2023-04-29

In the manuscript, Chinese text or charts appear, and they need to be translated into English or have English notes.

顺利毕业aaa 2023-04-27

Hello, I just submitted a post and it was rejected with the message "Please provide the item description in English language." May I ask what does this mean?

顺利毕业aaa 2023-04-27

Hello, I just submitted a contribution and it was returned with the prompt "Please provide the item description in English language." May I ask what does this mean?

SilviaSCI 2023-04-24

Borrowing the advice of the guru. I hope for good luck too.

快快快接收 2023-04-23

After three months, the manuscript entered the "under review" status with the editor. It underwent major revisions during the first review, which took two months. Following this, there was a month and a half for minor revisions. After the minor revisions, further minor revisions were required. The entire process, from submission to acceptance, took a total of one and a half years.

arcpy 2023-04-22

Does editing follow such a regular pattern?

arcpy 2023-04-22

Low quality or irrelevant articles may be rejected quickly, but sometimes taking longer is not necessarily a bad thing.

SilviaSCI 2023-04-20

3.11 submitted, 3.16 with editor, 4.16 status still updated as with editor, anxious. How long does it usually take for everyone to get reviewed?

SilviaSCI 2023-04-20

It has been over a month, still with the editor.

vvyaya 2023-03-11

I don't know if it's the same as what you all experts said, but the review process is very slow.

渔樵耕读 2023-02-22

From the perspective of the seven-month submission process, the speed is indeed slow, and it seems like the editor always handles the manuscripts on the last day of each month. I wonder if everyone else experiences the same thing.

arcpy 2023-01-30

Is the speed faster now?

SSCI_007 2022-12-30

After 4 months, the editor directly rejected it. It's really disgusting, a waste of time. The associate editor clearly does not have a research background in this field, not even giving a chance for review. I can only say that I will never submit to this journal again.

TRON 2022-12-10

It may not be in line with the theme of the journal. The review process for this journal takes four months from the beginning.

arcpy 2022-09-27

Is there no reason at all?

xiaohl 2022-09-23

After four months of applying, I was directly rejected without any reason. Perhaps my problems were indeed significant.

快快快接收 2022-06-14

Does the renovation need to be changed to the format of Isville?

快快快接收 2022-06-14

Major renovation after 8 months of submission.

miaqiqi 2022-06-09

Excuse me, did it take three months from the first trial to the second trial? It has been a month since my first trial, and I still haven't received any news. I'm anxious.

arcpy 2022-05-26

During the epidemic, there is a shortage of editors, which indeed caused many delays in review. Currently, adjustments have been made and improved to expedite the review process while ensuring quality and reputation. It is worth looking forward to.

TRON 2022-05-25

Return to the first review after 4 months, major revisions.
Return to the second review after 7 months, minor revisions.
Accepted after 20 days.
The journal is not bad, but the review process is really slow. Excluding the time I took for revisions, it took nearly 1 year from submission to acceptance. Fellow researchers in urgent need of publication should be cautious when considering submitting to this journal.

背对河山 2022-05-11

2022-5-10: With Editor

背对河山 2022-05-08

May I withdraw the submission, it has been too long?

背对河山 2022-05-08

2022-5-08: Submitted to Journal

Translation: 2022-5-08: Enviado ao Jornal

我要发论文111 2022-03-21

Today, the rejection notice finally came. From December 4th, 2021 to March 21st, 2022, the status has never changed.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started