wangyunxiang 2023-07-10

Excuse me, has it been a month with the editor?

binyuevil 2023-07-01

I stayed at the editorial office for a month and got rejected. Rejection of the submission is acceptable, but being told one month later that it won't be reviewed is truly unacceptable. Please submit your work carefully!

ynufit 2023-06-20

The initial review speed is a bit slow. Submitted on March 21st, reviewed by reviewers on April 21st, reviewed by the editor on May 9th, reviewed by reviewers again on June 2nd, reviewed by the editor again on June 8th, and reviewed by reviewers until now on June 12th.

学生233 2023-06-02

6.2major revision

学生233 2023-05-05

Corrected on 4.26 by editor; reviewed on 5.5

学生233 2023-05-05

4.23 with editor translates to "4.23 with editor."
5.5 with reviewer translates to "5.5 with reviewer."

学生233 2023-04-26

avec éditeur

学生233 2023-04-23

avec les critiques

学生233 2023-04-11

Sent on March 21, approximately ten days with the editor.

zzssyy 2022-11-02

May I ask what is your current status now?

grayspring 2022-08-01

Posted on June 29th, it has been about 10 days with the editor and it is still in this state. Is this normal?

AkiliWang 2022-07-06

2022-07-6 Morning with editor, afternoon with reviewers again.

AkiliWang 2022-07-06

2022-07-06 con editor translates to "2022-07-06 with editor" in English.

AkiliWang 2022-06-23

2022-06-23 Con revisores

AkiliWang 2022-06-16

2022-06-16 avec l'éditeur translates to "2022-06-16 with the editor" in English.

AkiliWang 2022-06-15

Delivered on June 9th. It has been with the editor's office until now. Is this normal?

lixueguang 2022-05-21

Email submission to the Bioinformatics journal.

The email content is exactly the same. Have you encountered this situation before?

Sonic_Cu 2022-02-28

Submitted in mid-September, after one month, it was with the editor. A few days later, it was with the reviewer. Finally, in mid-December, it was returned for major revisions. In mid-January, the revised manuscript was submitted, and at the end of February, it was accepted.

来不啦啦啦 2022-02-25

May I ask how long is the hiring process?

riverWater 2022-02-21

How long does it take for the results to come out?

junl 2021-12-22

No way, I feel that the Bioinformatics reviewers in my small field are very professional and have a deep understanding of the domain.

ffww 2021-10-03

The so-called "Chinese Academy of Sciences" division is actually just a division made by the "Chinese Academy of Sciences Library", so there is no need to take it seriously.

qasim 2021-04-09

This journal is deteriorating. The two papers I reviewed this year have significant drawbacks and average novelty. I strongly rejected them, but the editor ultimately accepted them.

LianL 2021-04-06

May I ask if you have any results?

liaochenlanruo 2021-03-03

The application notes were submitted on January 3rd, 2021. They have gone through several rounds of review with reviewers and the editor. It has been two months, and now it is back in the hands of the editor without any results.

windytian 2021-02-09

There is indeed such a tendency, and doing so is also too careless about one's image!

Anonymous（匿名） 2021-02-05

Agree with the previous comment: "As a well-established and classic journal in bioinformatics, being insulted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences like this? Supporting domestic journals can be understood, but this kind of approach is definitely unacceptable and chaotic!"

广东医疗 2021-02-03

The impact factor of bioinformatics is decreasing at a visible speed. Can you believe it is now classified as Zone 3 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences? Recently, many people around me have been talking about it, so it seems that it is indeed becoming more and more mediocre...