hubugeorgeczy 2023-08-04

First submitted 10 days -> Submission checks complete 14 days -> Ready to assign the editor 4 days -> Editor appointed Now 3 days ...

This journal has very few submissions, and basically follows the progress of processing a batch of manuscripts per month from the associate editor to the editor's hands, and then decides who to send for review.

Oh well, let's wash up and go to sleep!!

wfzd 2023-08-03

Can any experienced person who has gone through the entire submission process share the changes in status each time?
After peer review, will there be any changes in the appointed editor, or does the peer review status already include the allocation of an editor and the submission operation?
Could someone share their recent submission cycle? Thank you.

Jay_ME 2023-08-02

Drink, drink, I can't help but comment. After passing the technical review on July 3rd, it wasn't until 2 hours ago that it became "Editor appointed", a whole month! This efficiency is also low.

称霸比奇堡 2023-07-31

Can I ask what prompts there will be if the editor has been assigned or if it has been sent for review under the peer review status? When I click on peer review, there is an active comment on someone else's article. What does this mean?

斜阳 2023-07-30

The technical review is complete, and the current status is "ready to assign the editor."

hyx333100 2023-07-29

It has been 16 days since submission under peer review on my side, does it mean the editor has not been assigned yet?

网志 2023-07-29

My second review has always been maintained at the stage of technical review passing for a month, and then suddenly completed. I don't know if it's because the system hasn't been updated.

Jay_ME 2023-07-29

I passed the technical check on July 3rd, and the status has remained unchanged until now. =. =

hubugeorgeczy 2023-07-29

The editor is really dragging their feet.

hubugeorgeczy 2023-07-29

It has been 16 days and it is still in the hands of the deputy editor. There is no external review at all. You have no active reviews at the time. New invitations will show on this page when you receive them.

hubugeorgeczy 2023-07-28

After the technical review, "Peer review, UNDER REVIEW" does not mean that the editor has sent it for review. It should still be with the editor, and I haven't seen the status "assigned to the editor". I have sent an email and received a non-committal reply as follows:

Thank you for your email.
This is to inform you that your manuscript has been recently assigned to the editor for evaluation. From there, rest assured that we will keep you posted as soon as the updates are available for your paper.

hyx333100 2023-07-27

After peer review, will there be any status updates? Can we see the assigned editor and reviewers?

斜阳 2023-07-21

It has been a week and there is still no news. The technical review is still ongoing, but there hasn't been any update on the timeline since the first day when there was a record.

hubugeorgeczy 2023-07-15

The first technical review was submitted, and it took 14 days to pass the technical review when submitted again. This efficiency is disappointing. Now there is probably no assigned editor yet. It will probably take at least another half a month to find a reviewer after assigning an editor.

hubugeorgeczy 2023-07-15

Your main editor has not been found yet, right? The peer review status should include finding an editor, who is also a peer, right?

hubugeorgeczy 2023-07-09

How long has the technical review been going on? Has it been submitted for review?

没有票 2023-06-30

May I ask how long it will take to be assigned to an editor? The technical review has taken several days. It has been several days and still no editor has been assigned. Does this mean it's not going to happen...

没有票 2023-06-30

How long does it usually take to be assigned to an editor? The technical review has taken quite a few days. It has been several days and still no editor has been assigned. Does this mean it's not going to happen anymore...

bigtree 2023-06-21

Some editors request more references. Hehe.

David_Wang_USA 2023-06-15

I have two articles published here, and I feel that the influence of the magazine is rapidly increasing. The impact factor has also been rising quickly in recent years, so it is worth everyone's prompt submission.
The comments from the reviewers I received are very fair and helpful for the quality of the articles. I haven't seen any unreasonable or irrelevant opinions that are commonly found in other journals. I feel that the editors are seriously promoting the quality of the articles, and they even make rare adjustments to the wording.
As a journal that publishes full articles, the processing speed is relatively fast. Compared to others that can take six months or a year, this is much faster. My articles are usually handled within two months.
Overall, I feel that this journal has great potential.
Additionally, the format of Nature-Springer publishers is slightly different from other places, but in some aspects, it seems to be simpler.

bigtree 2023-06-07

IF has already reached 20+.

网志 2023-06-03

Accepted in less than three months, underwent two major revisions, everything was fixed before it was approved. After being promoted to a higher rank, the requirements became higher. I guess it will be difficult to publish if the impact factor doesn't increase further.

Tenacity 2023-05-25

Can anyone kindly introduce the process of submission and acceptance? I would be very grateful.

端小森-茂 2023-05-19

It's okay, there is great potential, worth investing in. ?

沧海一粟 2023-04-28

Hello brother, may I ask what the status is after peer review? How can I find out if it has been passed or not by the editor?

网志 2023-04-06

The editor agrees that this does not seem to show, and it will be sent for review directly.

网志 2023-04-06

It should be that the editor has not agreed yet, I don't know which editor is invited, and unlike ACS, I don't know that editors can send emails to ask. I just need the editor to designate two days.

wdwzdjs 2023-04-06

I have been going through technical review for a week, but the editor has not been assigned yet.

网志 2023-04-05

Reviewers agreed that completion is the peer review process, right? My external review has been going on for half a month with two reviewers.

wdwzdjs 2023-04-03

It seems like the peer review process of this journal includes editor assignment.