找我投稿 2023-08-08

Generally, the ones chosen are not selected. The ones chosen by the author are not very professional or have conflicts with time, and there are many issues. The editor will still choose other suitable ones. Of course, if you have excellent scholars who do not conflict with interests, you can recommend more. If they are suitable, the editor will still adopt them.

找我投稿 2023-08-08

Posts can be retrieved two months after they are published.

找我投稿 2023-08-08

Is the water good or not? I have to see what you wrote to know if it's good or not.

找我投稿 2023-08-08

By the end of the year, we should be able to allocate the budget.

kkkkai 2023-07-24

2023.5.20 Submission
2023.6.29 Accepted

Lcc 2023-07-21

Hello, may I ask how long it will take for the current status to wait for the editor's decision?

Lcc 2023-07-21

Hello, may I ask if yours is okay? Mine is also waiting for editing to make a decision.

安里鹏 2023-07-13

If everything goes smoothly, the process is very fast, and it takes about a month from submission to acceptance. However, the submission was rejected once and had to be resubmitted. Surprisingly, there were 50 comments from the reviewers, indicating that they put in a lot of effort.

May I ask, is it necessary to be so meticulous in open source projects?

闭关修炼 2023-07-03

Why can't I find the article that my colleague submitted a year ago on Web of Science?

流连忘返 2023-05-30

Already been warned, it's better to be cautious, mate.

123ffg 2023-05-24

Is our journal all special issues and regular issues?

123ffg 2023-05-24

I would like to ask if this journal does not have regular issues. Why are all the research topics related to topics and special issues?

奔跑的肉夹馍 2023-05-07

Will all the papers in this journal be indexed?

zhangsan11 2023-03-27

Why is it that after the reviewers' comments were revised, they all gave positive evaluations, but it has been a week and there is still no decision made by the editor?

yy的 2023-03-16

Does it have any impact to apply for a low-level warning now for a master's degree graduation?

伐历 2023-03-15

Let you choose more points, and editing is required to select.

伐历 2023-03-15

Let you choose a little more, then he can make a better selection.

Duan Minghan 2023-03-06

The academic standards of the Chinese Academy of Sciences have become the standards for all research institutions in China. Do you find it laughable?

Ryan 2023-03-01

The fact has proven that the upgraded version is Zone 3.

Ryan 2023-03-01

When submitting, the system requires selecting 5 reviewers. Will all 5 people really be asked to review? Usually, isn't it enough to have 2-3 reviewers?

麦当劳在逃鸡块 2023-02-07

Reply on the same day, but he asked each of us authors to reply to his email to withdraw the submission. Some people haven't replied yet, so technically I haven't completed withdrawing the submission... Stuck in an awkward situation.

爱学习的小li 2023-02-06

Brother, how long did it take for the withdrawal editor to reply to you? It's been almost a week for me, and the editor still hasn't replied.

麦当劳在逃鸡块 2023-02-04

There was a small incident. After I found the special issue, I submitted an abstract first and received approval. Then, I submitted the full paper. After submission, they directly rejected and asked me to resubmit, giving me three suggestions. Two of them were vague, and one of them had nothing to do with my paper at all. I was confused at that time and wondered what the reason was. I thought about making changes to the two vague suggestions and resubmitting. However, the next day, the editor told me that they had confused the opinion of the academic editor and that there was no problem with my paper. They asked me to submit it again and sent it for review directly. I was speechless...

麦当劳在逃鸡块 2023-02-04

The text translates to:

"I chose to submit to the buildings, land, and ijgi journals before the warning, because the author had fewer publications and the proportion of Chinese authors was not the highest. The review process was fast, taking about 7 days with three reviewers. Two of them approved the paper directly, while one had some negative feedback and gave 5 must-do revisions, with 1-2 points being more serious (not necessary but could make the paper more rigorous), but all of them were solvable. After waiting for a week during the Chinese New Year, the editor gave a rejection with the opportunity to resubmit, asking me to focus on addressing the concerns of the negative reviewer (also saying that some changes that couldn't be made could be deleted instead).

Because the editor's feedback came a week after I saw the reviewer comments, I had already made the revisions during that week, so I resubmitted immediately after receiving the rejection.

Two or three days later, I saw that the paper was flagged, so I chose to withdraw it. It was frustrating to have to go through another round of revisions (although they were not major changes, and the research framework remained unchanged) and it took 20 days. But I am grateful to that stubborn reviewer, otherwise, if the paper had been accepted and then flagged, it would have been really embarrassing..."

Mia_apr 2023-02-03

Awkward, online on the 28th and warning on the 31st, where can I go to explain... I have revised it twice and added an experiment, this reviewer is quite responsible. What is zky doing?

爱学习的小li 2023-02-02

Will papers submitted before the warning be restricted by the institution even if they are accepted after the warning?

科研小白6 2023-02-02

In our organization, any journal that enters the Chinese Academy of Sciences' early warning list is not supported financially and is not considered as part of our workload. In other words, it means that entering the early warning list is not recognized. It seems that many universities still value the Chinese Academy of Sciences' early warning journals! It's better to be cautious about submitting manuscripts in the future!

healerman 2023-02-02

I guess it's because the protection fee was not paid properly. I don't believe that the number of articles published by that in-house publishing house has exceeded ten thousand and still they are of good quality.

zidukeben 2023-02-02

The latest upgraded version includes three zones: major categories and subcategories.

zidukeben 2023-02-02

The early warning system has lost its credibility, and there are not many schools following the early warning anymore.