秋刀鱼 2022-11-09

Reviewed for a month, one reviewer has completed the review, while the other one has not agreed to review yet, and currently, I dare not urge them, so I can only wait again.

秋刀鱼 2022-10-09

Are there not many people submitting articles to this magazine? I got destroyed by the first district and top journals, so I switched to this one. The impact factor is decent, and my article is currently under review. I hope for a positive outcome.

切尔西的匕首 2021-06-26

This editor needs me to add a medical ethics review.

黑猫白鼻子 2021-05-10

First time submitting to SCI, very nervous, but unexpectedly went very smoothly.
Submitted on January 18th; received reviewer comments on February 22nd with minor revisions; returned revised manuscript on March 15th; accepted on March 23rd.
Overall, the journal's efficiency is extremely high. Professor Christine Kranz handled the process very quickly and seriously. Thank you to the editor and reviewers!

珂珂米 2021-01-12

10.17 Submission
11.28 First revision, given one month for modifications. Three reviewers provided close to 30 comments, giving constructive feedback on areas with flaws in the article and some formatting issues. Two reviewers had positive opinions, while the other reviewer remained neutral. After careful revisions, the revised article was returned on 12.18. A few days later, it was shown for reevaluation.
12.28 Second revision, one month for modifications. The reviewers agreed to accept it, but the editor believed there were significant language issues and incorrect chart formats (I did not carefully review the author guidelines). If not properly modified, it could still be rejected. The editor also helped me improve the language in the abstract and introduction, showing their dedication and meticulousness. It is evident that the journal has high requirements for language and figure quality. The revised manuscript was returned on 1.9.
1.1 Acceptance
In general, the journal has a relatively high efficiency, and the editor is also very patient.