卷喵 2023-07-26

The second time I submitted to this journal, I felt that the process was still very fast, and it seems that the number of submissions is not very large.
20230711 Submitted
20230712 Under review by editor
20230724 Decision in process
20230725 Editor provided revisions, resubmitted after making changes (one month for revisions)
I will update again later.

Haipeng 2023-07-18

This journal is really speechless. I feel that the editor-in-chief is irresponsible. The reasons for rejection are all sorts of strange. They even said that the discussion on the dataset was not thorough enough, despite barely being reviewed, it was rejected by the editor-in-chief. It's ridiculous. Be cautious about submitting to this journal!

hugo 2023-05-26

Especially pretending, saying that they have received a large number of papers, with the manuscript number 341, submitted on May 19th, pretending so much that it makes one want to vomit.

Tynice 2023-05-23

2023.5.18 Submit
2023.5.22 Technical advice
2023.5.23 Resubmit

投稿太难了 2023-05-02

Ten days later for processing, three more days for review, one month later for returning with revision comments. Half a month later for making revisions, a little over a week for returning with revision comments. Two days for making revisions, three days later accepted.

Paypay 2023-04-24

How long does it usually take for the review process? It has been almost three weeks since it was with the editor.

ssaasdasd 2023-04-07

The first review seems to have taken about half a year, with approximately 8 comments from two reviewers. After making modifications according to their suggestions, the paper has significantly improved.
PS: Do not resist the opinions of the reviewers.
Currently, it has been modified and submitted, awaiting the second round of review.

卷喵 2022-12-28

2022.12.27 Received
The editor happened to be in the same field, but the first time the modifications were not made according to what the editor wanted. The next day, it was immediately returned for further modifications.
After careful modifications were made during the second time, it was sent back for rework on the 26th and received on the 27th.

卷喵 2022-12-01

2022.10.21 External review completed, waiting for editing decision
2022.11.18 Minor revisions (received comments from one reviewer, made minor revisions. Editor made additional small editing suggestions)
2022.12.01 Minor revisions returned

yinglibme 2022-11-16

No, at that time my collaborator did not receive the email.

果 2022-11-06

Is there any result, my friend?

卷喵 2022-08-31

2022.8.20 under review status unchanged, only the date has been changed.

nulilive 2022-08-17

Did it show "with editor" immediately after you submitted it yesterday?

nulilive 2022-08-16

Hello, may I ask if all authors need to verify before they can proceed? It seems like all authors have received an email.

卷喵 2022-07-30

Subject-related: Information Systems and Neural Networks
Submitted on July 21, 2022
Reviewed by the editor on July 24, 2022
Under review as of July 29, 2022

kevin Tian 2021-06-21

Not recommended to submit, the review speed can only be described as average. It has been with the editor for one and a half months, and those seeking speed should basically give up. The number of manuscripts submitted for publication in Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering (BBE) exceeds the journal's publication capabilities.