Verified Reviews - Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

学渣二狗 2023-08-08

Will it still be rejected after the major repair?

Jinyang 2023-08-07

2023.07.21: Submitted
2023 08.05: Under review

必accept 2023-08-03

2023. 6. 27 Submission
With editor for over ten days
2023. 8. 3 Major revision

kakahun 2023-07-20

Recently, there have been no submissions.

kakahun 2023-07-20

15 days is too much to wait for the editor.

不摆烂的猪 2023-07-18

May I ask how to pay the layout fee for this journal?

ghjkl 2023-07-15

Demand for 20% or less.

kakahun 2023-07-14

Just submitted follow-up comments.

Taoer 2023-07-05

I, this journal seems to include reference plagiarism detection, with a requirement of less than 20%. How did you handle it afterwards?

活血化瘀 2023-07-01

May I ask if you have checked for plagiarism before submitting your contribution? What is the plagiarism detection rate?

活血化瘀 2023-07-01

Has anyone been rejected due to plagiarism check?

jkkkk12 2023-06-15

Having served as a reviewer for this journal twice, I feel that the quality of the articles is uneven, and luck plays a significant role.

Yaoguojia 2023-06-05

2023.02.21 Submission
2023.04.26 Major revision
2023.05.31 Accept
The editing process was very fast! Both reviewers are experts in the industry and very strict, so it was not easy!

jun0226 2023-06-05

2023.05.16 submitted to journal
2023.05.21 with editor
2023.05.26 with editor 1 change of date
2023.06.04 under review
It is noticed that most of the changes in dates (statuses) occur during the weekends, especially on Sundays!

学渣二狗 2023-05-24

5.20 First submission, rejected due to high similarity rate.
6.20 Continued submission, grateful to the editor for providing major revisions.
8.8 Under revision, looking forward to positive results.
PS: The first SCI paper. The journal is very nice, the review process is fast, and the reviewers are also very professional. Planning to submit another one.

学渣二狗 2023-05-21

2023.05.21 submitted to the journal
2023.05.28 With Editor
2023.05.31 Reject
2023.06.20 submitted to the journal
2023.06.25 With Editor
2023.06.28 under review
2023.07.20 major revision
2023.08.07 revision submitted to journal
2023.08.08 With Editor

Translation:

2023.05.21 - Submitted to the journal
2023.05.28 - Under review by the editor
2023.05.31 - Rejected
2023.06.20 - Submitted to the journal again
2023.06.25 - Under review by the editor
2023.06.28 - Undergoing review
2023.07.20 - Requires major revision
2023.08.07 - Revised version submitted to the journal
2023.08.08 - Under review by the editor

oama123 2023-04-19

Have you submitted this article for more than a year??? Which journal is it for?

oama123 2023-04-19

Returned on April 3rd for minor revisions and accepted on April 13th. The entire process took over three months, as the article had undergone multiple rounds of revisions before submission. The speed of this journal has been progressively slowing down, and the review process has become increasingly stringent.

lvmazha 2023-04-11

2022.11.29 Submission
2022.12.5 Re-submission after modification, more than 10 figures, combining small figures into one big figure
2023.1.8 Under review
2023.2.22 Major revision, 2 reviewers, 26+ comments, both technical and content-related
2023.3.8 Revised submission
2023.3.12 Under review
2023.4.9 Accepted

cerulean岁月 2023-03-10

Send an email to remind them, if the reviewers have been invited but have not accepted the review, the reminder may not be very effective.

Yaoguojia 2023-03-09

How should we handle a long period without anyone reviewing the manuscript?

Yaoguojia 2023-03-09

How should we handle the situation after 50 days without a reviewer reviewing the manuscript?

oama123 2023-02-28

Submitted on December 23rd, possibly due to the Christmas season abroad, it took about a week to be reviewed. It remained under review for approximately 2 months, and on February 23rd, the reviewers' comments were returned. There were 3 reviewers, all suggesting minor revisions, which were provided by the editor. The paper had previously been submitted to an energy journal and had been delayed for about a year due to multiple revisions. I became frustrated and decided to submit it to this journal directly. I will continue to strive in the future, but it's hard to express my feelings.

菽香 2023-02-21

Excuse me, is there a limit on the number of pages for this journal? The official website states that it should not exceed 5 pages, but previous papers have all been longer than that. Seeking assistance, thank you!

xzc 2023-02-15

Second trial, anxiously waiting.

xzc 2023-02-05

In the email sent by the editor, there is a link that can be viewed.

PhD.Li 2023-02-04

May I ask where you found the number of reviewers for the manuscript?

xzc 2023-01-26

Hello, do you have a second reviewer?

wayne123 2023-01-18

Have you received any emails from the editorial department after your paper was accepted? I was accepted on December 29, 2022, but I haven't received any further processing emails yet.

wayne123 2023-01-18

After you are hired, how long does it usually take to receive emails from the editorial department? It has been 20 days on my end, and I have not received any relevant emails yet.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started