Verified Reviews - Materials Chemistry Frontiers
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

喃喃学语 2023-04-06

Brother, can we work together?

CocuLiu 2023-02-13

Return the revised manuscript in about a week after coming back to review the comments, hoping for continuous improvement!

黑小威 2022-12-21

Edited by Shu Seki, received feedback for revisions one month after submission. Made the requested revisions but was rejected. The editor requested a major revision and resubmission. Resubmitted after 7 days and was rejected after 24 days (two reviewers, one agreed to accept, the other pasted my conclusion and suggested further optimization of experimental results, and recommended submission to RSC advance). Feeling a bit disappointed but mostly speechless. Although I have submitted many times and have become accustomed to rejections, it is difficult to accept such a rejection reason without any feedback or explanation, especially when one reviewer provided substantial revision suggestions and agreed to accept the revised manuscript. Sigh, still not good enough, mediocrity is the original sin.

wahwahwahwah 2022-11-18

It feels better to watch the editors. Some editors are still good. Everyone should actively contribute. The trend of IF is still good. Domestic journals will not be wrong in the future.

CTGU-Ran 2022-10-29

What kind of application do you work on? We can work on it together.

生物医用材料123 2022-10-16

I am engaged in cellular biology and I am not good at material preparation and characterization. I would like to collaborate on publishing high-impact articles on biomaterials.

ajkdajkld 2022-10-10

I submitted an article in June, but the editor did not process it for 20 days. On the 21st day, it was directly rejected by the editor, who was named Wang Dan. It seems like this person really doesn't handle submissions much, always dragging it out.
Now I submitted again, and it took one day for the initial review. Then it went to the editor's hands, and it has been a week with no news.
I have never seen an editor as slow as this. If they don't want it, they can just reject it. Please don't drag it along.

ajkdajkld 2022-09-23

After using SCI-HUB to download or receive, the journal will provide the boss with a download link to access the page numbers.

qwlqwl1995 2022-09-23

We don't have it anyway, maybe only the Institute of Chemistry has it...

天伟 2022-09-15

I have also experienced it. The manuscript was held by the editor for 3 months without being reviewed. After urging for submission, it was rejected after 3 days.

YUAN22 2022-09-11

Too slow, submission for one week, or editing office.

GX 2022-08-11

Chinese Academy of Sciences, after all, publishes cutting-edge journals.

滴滴打 2022-08-10

Want to know which university or institute owns the copyright for this journal? I tried several universities but couldn't find it... My own article is online but I can't even download it... Embarrassing.

To Be JACS 2022-07-11

I feel that my work is not good enough! I didn't expect the comments after review to be very positive, so I will make some changes to my own opinion.

滴滴打 2022-07-07

May I ask how many reviewers you have?

独木舟 2022-07-03

The speed is quite fast. The third electrochemistry paper, I have been exploring it from beginning to end on my own, to be honest, I didn't expect it to be accepted. It took about one and a half months from submission to acceptance.

zzzyyyjjj 2022-07-02

Find a template online, and you can remind them.

zzzyyyjjj 2022-07-02

This editor is a bit slow. I gave it to him for three weeks to edit, then I had to urge him, and he became quite fast after being urged.
This editor might be a bit busy.

ajkdajkld 2022-07-02

By the way, how do you go about urging for manuscripts? I submitted mine on June 11th, and it went through the initial review within a week. Then it reached the hands of the editor. Today is July 2nd, and it's still with the editor. The editor I chose is also Wang. This is frustrating.

zzzyyyjjj 2022-07-02

Acceptance is immediate after modification, and the initial review process is relatively slow. However, as long as the submission is made, the review time is within 14 days, and the later stages are very fast. IF has already reached 8.68, so everyone should actively submit their contributions.

是糯米团子啊 2022-06-16

Hello~ May I ask how many reviewers are usually involved in a journal? The progress of my article indicates that two reviewers have provided their comments, but the editor has not sent any emails yet. I'm not sure what's going on and feeling anxious.

是糯米团子啊 2022-06-16

How many reviewers do you have on your side? The progress of my article shows that two reviewers have already submitted their comments, but the editor has yet to send any modification emails. I'm not sure what the situation is.

是糯米团子啊 2022-06-15

Hello~ May I ask how many reviewers there are?

zzzyyyjjj 2022-05-15

After 21 days, the editor will urge for the manuscript, and it will be reviewed two days later.

zzzyyyjjj 2022-05-10

Still with the editor, 19th day... The chosen one is Wang Dan as the editor, but I don't know what they are busy with...

LYL123@ 2022-05-10

May I ask if yours is still with the editor? Mine has been there for over a week.

zzzyyyjjj 2022-05-06

May I ask what happened later?

zzzyyyjjj 2022-05-03

14-day initial assessment, then with editor, it's been 12 days now, no news...
Is it the same for everyone? Share your experience~

zzzyyyjjj 2022-04-15

How long does the initial assessment take for everyone?

Eyes on me 2022-04-03

It took more than 2 months to review the draft, and the editing process took about 3-4 weeks on the phone. Fortunately, the review comments were relatively positive.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started