HYP95 2023-06-23

Ah... It's all about manipulating peer reviews.

打爆你的小馒头 2023-04-15

Very good journal, the submission was assigned to an editor the next day, and the review process was fast. The first review took about 3 weeks, and the editor requested major revisions. After making the revisions, one reviewer was not satisfied and requested minor revisions. The editor accepted the revisions on the same day they were made. The overall submission experience was excellent, and I am grateful to editor Prof. Ren and editor Prof. Mori. I hope MTP (the journal) can soon return to the top tier.

多多发SCI 2023-03-19

Very slow, dragging on and on.

Ai_王二狗 2023-03-18

Generally, if the quality of a paper is not good, editors will politely say that it does not meet the requirements. In the case of the PR series, they would directly tell you that your quality is not up to par. Please assess the level of your manuscript objectively. However, are you sure you can blame the reviewers for this?

Chen accept 2022-11-20

When did they accept your article? It has been over ten days since I sent my revised draft back, but I haven't received any news yet.

GJM0123 2022-11-04

The article was rejected by Yu Ying, an editor from Central China Normal University, on the grounds that it did not fit the theme of the journal.

东周乖乖的奶糖 2022-09-22

May I ask how to check the submission status? I logged into my account using my email, but there are no submission files inside.

市民7 2022-07-25

Below is the timeline:

Submitted: 2022.5.1
With Editor: 2022.5.1
Under Review: 2022.5.4
Required Reviews Completed: 2022.6.12
Major Revision: 2022.6.13 (9 comments, with 4 requiring simulation supplementation)
Reversion Submitted to Journal: 2022.7.6
With Editor: 2022.7.6
Under Review: 2022.7.8
Under Review: 2022.7.18
Required Reviews Completed: 2022.7.22
Minor Revision: 2022.7.22 (requires certain supplemental work to be included in supporting information)
Reversion Submitted to Journal: 2022.7.23
With Editor: 2022.7.23
Accepted: 2022.7.24

市民7 2022-07-25

A purely simulated work was first rejected after submitting to MD. It took several weeks to carefully revise according to the reviewers' comments. Later, it was submitted to Mater Today Nano, with three reviewers: two positive and one slightly negative. Although it was rejected, the work received recognition from the top experts. After carefully revising according to the reviewers' comments, it was submitted to MTP. After over a month, the reviewers provided nine major revisions, which were challenging to address despite the limited number of comments. A significant amount of additional work was added. During this period, another paper needed to be revised urgently. It was hurriedly completed in 20 days and fortunately received unanimous recognition from the reviewers. I am grateful to Prof. Shuo Chen and the reviewers for their recognition of the work, and I hope that MTP can successfully return to the top tier.

拖累大家 2022-07-12

It's so disappointing. The research direction is consistent with the editor-in-chief's, but it got rejected by the deputy editor for not aligning with the journal's theme. I want to ask Yuying from Central China Normal University, are you serious?

妙蛙种子2022 2022-07-04

Trashy small circle magazine. It's all about connections, they only have 1-2 reviewers, and the reviewers are recommended by the authors themselves. Even if the reviewers give clear rejection opinions, they still accept it without making any changes.
This magazine is considered to have mastered playing the Impact Factor game, a group of Chinese people playing in a small circle, boosting the Impact Factor. The quality of the papers is outrageously low, with many obvious conceptual errors.
Trash. I won't read it, cite it, or review for it. I will blacklist all the materials today series for life.

hityingph 2022-06-16

Received at Editorial Office 21 Mar 2022; Article revised 14 May 2022; Article accepted for publication 9 Jun 2022.

Translation: The article was received at the Editorial Office on March 21, 2022. It was revised on May 14, 2022, and finally accepted for publication on June 9, 2022.

Nat.jiang 2022-05-16

Accepted 5.13
Thank you to the editor-in-chief Ren and editor Qian Zhang. We hope the journal will continue to improve. Please prioritize considering Mater Today Phys for future good work.

Nat.jiang 2022-05-13

submit 2022/3/7 - This means that something was submitted on March 7, 2022.
with editor 2022/3/14 - This indicates that the submission was received by the editor on March 14, 2022.
under review 2022/3/16 - This indicates that the submission is currently being reviewed as of March 16, 2022.
decision 2022/4/15 major - This means that a decision has been made regarding the submission on April 15, 2022, and it is a significant decision.
reversion submitted 2022/4/25 - This indicates that a revision or updated version was submitted on April 25, 2022.
under review 2022/4/26 - This means that the revised version is currently being reviewed as of April 26, 2022.

市民7 2022-05-05

The submission was reviewed in just three days. Looking forward to it.

htao12014 2022-04-28

The editor I assigned is Professor Qian Zhang.

htao12014 2022-04-28

Thank you to the chief editor and editor Professor Qian Zhang. Thumbs up for the speed of the journal.

Aerogel-Winky 2022-04-20

Which editor are you? I also submitted for review around the same time.

htao12014 2022-04-20

4.7 submit
4.16 review/submission

Aerogel-Winky 2022-04-18

4.9: submitted to journal
4.11: with editor
4.18: with editor

Isn't it supposed to be fast? I've been waiting for a long time, there has been no progress, it's still with the editor.

cuancuan 2022-04-06

2022.3.22 submitted
2022.3.28 under review, 2 reviewers
2022.4.5 rejected

merryking 2022-04-04

4.3 submit
4.4 with editor

Bebal- 2022-02-25

Posted for only a month and accepted at lightning speed!!!

Shirleyvv 2022-01-28

The whole process was super efficient. The submission was reviewed within two days, and I received revision comments within two weeks (with a one-month deadline for revisions). After resubmitting the revised manuscript, it was accepted within a day! Overall, the experience was excellent. I highly recommend this journal~

Thomas. F. An 2022-01-13

2021.10.11 Submission;
2021.11.14 Reviewer's comments received, two reviewers, editor requested major revisions within one month;
2021.12.28 Revised manuscript submitted;
2022.01.11 Accepted.

qwer 2021-11-30

May I ask how long it took you to submit it? It has been two weeks since it was handed to the editor but there has been no progress on my end...

qwer 2021-11-30

May I ask how long it took for you to submit the application? It has been half a month in the hands of the editor on my side, but there has been no progress yet...

6666777 2021-09-06

What a great magazine! It saved me. The review process only took 3 weeks to a month. Thanks to the editor-in-chief and the editor, Qian Zhang. Only 52 papers were published in 2019.

Lico 2021-08-13

It has been 4 days with the editor, is that normal?

润成 2021-08-07

The journal is excellent, both the submission process and the peer review are very fast, and it is also very friendly to Chinese scholars. As long as the content is of good quality, there is no bias.