zhang 2023-07-29

6.29投 - 6.29投 (not clear what this means, it could be a date or an action)

7.13大修一周 - 7.13 to 7.20 for major repairs for one week

7.20返回 - 7.20 return

7.22 Accept - 7.22 Accept

Brisk煜 2023-07-22

The translation of the given text into English is as follows: "The speed was very fast, with notice given for minor revisions within a month. After the revisions were made, the acceptance decision was made within a week. The reviewer's comments were very insightful and improved the quality of the paper."

Ruiruiz 2023-07-03

Rejected for 5 days, reasons are all the same.

ryh95 2023-05-16

The year is written incorrectly, it should be 2023.

ryh95 2023-05-16

2022.3.30 submitted
2022.4.17 major revision
2022.4.26 revision submitted
2022.5.10 minor revision
2022.5.10 revision submitted
2022.5.12 accept
2022.5.16 published

The research is in the field of complex networks. The overall review process was relatively fast. Wishing the journal continued success~

cynthia10 2023-04-24

2023/4/24: English correction completed.

cynthia10 2023-04-21

2023/4/21: accepted for publication.

楠瓜Leon 2023-04-21

2023.4.21-accepted translates to "Accepted on April 21, 2023" in English.

楠瓜Leon 2023-04-20

2023.4.20 - Pending editor decision.

楠瓜Leon 2023-04-19

2023.4.19-Pending minor revisions translates to English as: April 19, 2023 - Waiting for minor revisions.

falw 2023-04-18

I was also rejected instantly by the editor.

楠瓜Leon 2023-04-17

2023.4.16-Revised version review translates to "April 16, 2023 - Revised version review" in English.

cynthia10 2023-04-12

2023/4/6: Principal revisión
2023/4/12: Revisión de la versión corregida

cynthia10 2023-04-06

2023/3/3: submit
2023/3/3: pending review
2023/3/6: under review

leewin_wang 2023-04-02

Translated text: Accepted for Publication: 31st March 2023

楠瓜Leon 2023-03-29

2023.3.29 - Pending major revisions.

leewin_wang 2023-03-27

Has the feedback returned?

leewin_wang 2023-03-27

"Entered the Pending editor decision stage."

leewin_wang 2023-03-24

The submission is for a special issue.
Received: 12 March 2023
Under review: 13 March 2023
Major Revisions: 19 March 2023
Currently under revision, awaiting results.

楠瓜Leon 2023-03-20

Record
2023.3.18-submit
2023.3.18-Pending review
2023.3.20-Under review

R.W. 2023-03-03

How long does it take for pending review? Will it be rejected if it remains pending review for a long time?

月关帝国 2023-02-21

There is not only one reviewer for the magazine. After you rejected it, the editor may have sent it to other reviewers, and if they found it acceptable, it was accepted for publication! It is normal for different reviewers to have different opinions on the same article.

Analysis68 2023-02-19

"Reliance on connections is too serious."

MathFA 2023-02-18

The English version of China Science Mathematics has always been a good mathematical journal, and the quality of papers has greatly improved in recent years. However, there is something that makes people confused about certain operations of this journal: Last year, I reviewed a paper in a very familiar field, so I spent two months carefully reading the paper. At that time, I personally felt that although the paper had some commendable aspects, the traces of parallel generalization were too obvious, and it was also pointed out that they actually did not study the original conjecture, let alone make any progress in the research of the original conjecture. Therefore, I suggested that the authors rewrite the Abstract and Introduction, and also pointed out several flaws in proof details, but I did not recommend it for publication in the English version because it lacked originality and the results were not that impressive. After a few months, I unexpectedly found that the paper was accepted by China Science Mathematics (English version). If that's the case, what is the role of the reviewers? Can't the editor just make the decision directly?

hocking 2023-02-11

Estimado/a,

Nos dirigimos a usted para informarle que no podremos continuar procesando su propuesta. Las propuestas enviadas para revisión por pares son seleccionadas en base a la disciplina, novedad y relevancia general, además de los criterios habituales para la publicación en revistas académicas. Por lo tanto, nuestra decisión no necesariamente refleja la calidad de su trabajo.

Le deseamos mucho éxito si decide enviarlo a otro lugar.

Atentamente,

Holidaywuu 2023-02-10

May I ask if there is a reason for the rejection?

hocking 2023-02-06

2023-2-6 Submitted Pending review
2023-2-10 Rejected by Editor

666hh 2023-01-29

Take note, on January 27th it's "Pending review", it's been almost 3 days. Is it going to be rejected instantly?!

VvvvV66 2023-01-18

The "under" stage usually occurs after an article is submitted for review.

VvvvV66 2023-01-18

I was rejected for the first time too, but after making corrections to the experiment and revising it carefully, I resubmitted it.