卡拉咪 2023-07-28

There is no need to say about the speed. The manuscript was submitted on July 4th and the comments from three reviewers were received on the 20th. The comments from the fourth reviewer were received on the 21st. A total of four reviewers provided 44 comments for major revisions, and we were given 10 days to make the changes. The revised manuscript was returned on the 27th and accepted on the afternoon of the 28th. There were some minor issues due to personal reasons in between, but the assistant editors quickly helped resolve them. The questions raised by the reviewers were very professional, and I had a bit of a headache while making the changes. Luckily, the outcome was good, and I will consider submitting again in the future.

sci多多多多 2023-07-20

The given text "2023.6.29-2020.7.20" is not a valid date range since the starting date (2023.6.29) is ahead of the ending date (2020.7.20). Please provide a correct date range for translation.

忘记我吧下一位 2023-03-29

9 January 2023: Submission
28 January 2023: Major revisions
2 February 2023: Revised submission
6 February 2023: Rejected and resubmitted
14 February 2023: Second submission
21 March 2023: Major revisions
25 March 2023: Accepted
29 March 2023: Published

爱含宝宝真是太好了 2023-01-10

Posted on November 17, 2022
Completed two rounds
Received on January 10, 2023

redaiyulin 2023-01-08

I forgot to provide the resume, and the decision should also take about a week.

yellmmmm 2022-12-31

Recording the experience of submission:
12.13 submission
12.14 pending view
12.14 under view It was really fast to send it for external review. There is also an article in FC that has been there for a month and is still "With editor."
12.30 Pending minor revisions Two reviewers have returned their comments, uploaded on 12.23 and 12.29 respectively, both suggesting minor revisions. However, the Contact editor mentioned that if new comments come during the revision process, they should also be considered.

Overall, the speed is faster than any Elsevier journal I have encountered, and it seems like it has not been affected by the Christmas and New Year holidays?

The article processing charge is already 2200CHF, and there is news that it will increase to 2400CHF later. However, authors who have published in this journal can enjoy a 20% discount if they submit again after January 1st. It is necessary to inquire with the editor in advance.

Wishing myself and everyone good luck.

023zy 2022-12-30

May I ask if there is a request to provide all authors' resumes?

023zy 2022-12-30

Can someone please provide the resumes of all the authors?

pzm 2022-12-29

Hello, I would like to ask how many days after your pending decision you were notified of acceptance.

023zy 2022-12-18

Do you have the option to send an email requesting the organization's email and signature?

023zy 2022-12-18

11.15 submission
11.16 under review
11.16 request for the providing institution to reply via email
12.16 request for the authors to sign and no instructions on how to reply to them

jennysweet 2022-12-16

The first SCI publication, hoping that Foods can improve more and more, the journal's processing efficiency is quite high.

jennysweet 2022-12-16

The written content on genomics is slower than the previous submission experiences I have seen, possibly because there are more submissions this year. It was a pleasant submission experience, and the assistant editor patiently communicated with me through email with a good attitude (although I had to remind them later). After a minor revision, the paper was accepted. All four reviewers were very serious and responsible, with three providing a lot of suggestions on both formatting and content, and one reviewer asking me to refine the language again. Some of the review comments were inspiring for my future research. The publication fee is a bit expensive, increasing from 2000 CHF to 2200 CHF, so my junior colleagues dare not submit. Keep up the good work!

Dates:

10.9: Submitted
10.10: Under review
11.18: Pending minor revisions (sent an email two days ago to urge, found out that some reviewers reviewed it too late)
11.28: Resubmission received
11.29: Pending editor decision
12.15: Paper accepted

若曦 2022-12-12

Recently, they have been celebrating the holiday, and the progress has gradually slowed down.

鄢 2022-12-07

The application submitted in November 11th is still under review after nearly a month.

echo_d 2022-11-17

Dear, is there a result now?

MT 2022-11-05

The submission speed is very fast.
Submission on October 8, 2022.
Under review on October 9, 2022.
Minor revisions on November 3, 2022.
Revisions required on November 4, 2022.
Accepted on November 5, 2022.

jennysweet 2022-11-05

It has been under review for a month... No news...

jennysweet 2022-11-05

It has been nearly a month under review...

redaiyulin 2022-11-04

11.4 Paper accepted. Good luck to everyone.

redaiyulin 2022-11-03

When reviewing, it is invisible. Only when the editor makes a decision can the reviewer's opinions be seen.

jennysweet 2022-11-02

Where can I see the number of reviewers and pending decision when the paper is under review? I can't see these things on the system.

jennysweet 2022-11-01

It has been 20 days under review, and it seems that recently the review speed is not as fast as mentioned online.

Fuliner 2022-10-31

It seems like 2200 francs?

MT 2022-10-23

I have also been reviewing for 16 days, and there is still no news.

redaiyulin 2022-10-16

Invited reviewers again, it seems that it is becoming more and more strict.

redaiyulin 2022-10-11

Three reviewers, one is quite negative, the other two are very positive, but it has been pending decision for 5 days now. Praying for good luck and a little bit of speed~

redaiyulin 2022-10-04

It has been 16 days since the review, and there is still no result. I am anxious.

LANCE22 2022-09-24

Hello, may I ask where can I upload the modified article after receiving an email from the editorial assistant regarding the need to make changes for submitting the food contribution?

1 2022-09-21

Hello! May I ask if it is normal for a submission to show "under review" on the second day, receive an email from the editor assistant, make some minor changes, see that the content has also been modified accordingly, and then continue to show "under review" for almost a month? Have any of you encountered this situation?