Verified Reviews - IISE Transactions
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

湛然想去月球 2022-07-06

I am currently pursuing a PhD in Industrial Engineering in the United States. I have noticed a peculiar phenomenon, which is that this journal is highly recognized in the United States, at least not inferior to EJOR, and perhaps even slightly higher. However, its popularity in China cannot be compared to EJOR. This may be related to the professional setting in China. The field of Industrial Engineering in China is not the same as in foreign countries, at least not the same as what I know about in the United States. In China, most Industrial Engineering programs are affiliated with business schools, and researchers in this field mainly focus on Operations Management. On the other hand, in the United States, all Industrial Engineering departments are part of engineering colleges, and the research topics are diverse, with a relatively stronger emphasis on Engineering. Fewer IE departments in the US focus on Operations Management. As a result, even if someone in China is studying Industrial Engineering, they mainly pay attention to journals from a few business schools and are not familiar with IISE Transactions. In fact, if one is conducting research in the field of Industrial Engineering that is more inclined towards Engineering, this journal is considered as the top-tier publication.

Sophisticated 2021-10-02

Top journals in the field of Industrial Engineering, the journal of the Industrial and Systems Engineering Society, and fmsA-level. Each issue includes two themes, with 3-4 articles under each theme. The requirement is not only theoretical innovation but also a strong engineering application background. The review process is long, and the domestic ranking has been fluctuating between the third and fourth tiers.

Octagon 2021-04-19

In the field of industrial engineering, Tier 1 level, formerly known as IIE Transactions and AIIE Transactions. The editor-in-chief emphasizes the acceptance of articles with methodology innovation rather than method application. It requires a close integration with engineering practice.

There are generally 2-3 external reviewers, and the Associate Editor (AE) will also provide detailed suggestions in the first round. The review process consists of 2-3 rounds, with each round taking 2-3 months. The review comments are reasonable and detailed. Any good ideas or methods that have unique applications or advantages in engineering practice are worth trying.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started