Verified Reviews - ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

小胖哈哈2 2023-03-23

Can the order of authors be modified in this journal?

椰子SAS 2023-03-22

What a slow person! Be cautious when rushing to graduate and making investments!

Well_Well 2023-03-20

First submission to receiving major revisions took about 8 months. From the return on December 27th until now, it is still assigned to the editor.

KneeYu 2023-03-15

How long does it take to receive the proof after the journal accepts it? Why haven't I received the proof email yet since it was accepted on March 1st?

liusuxion 2023-03-14

Hello, the email was sent from my own email to this email address: (joshika.raj@springer.com). It is the submission email provided on the journal's homepage.
If I send a reminder through the system for the initial review, it seems it will go to the editor-in-chief's email, but I haven't received a reply yet.
Wishing for a successful acceptance.

snow merry 2023-03-13

May I ask if the editor's response to the manuscript reminder is sent to your email or can be viewed in the system's correspondence? I have not received a response to the manuscript reminder I sent.

snow merry 2023-03-06

I have been assigned to edit for four months, sigh.

SCI路上 2023-03-06

Tongxi, March 6th, under review.

大熊 2023-03-06

The latest update has arrived, family members.
2023-3-5 under review.

SCI路上 2023-03-05

The translation of the text into English is: "Exactly the same situation as yours, first review and amendment, it has been 4 months, no progress at all! I won't invest anymore in the future!"

大熊 2023-03-05

Some friends don't know how to urge for manuscripts. On the far left of the status bar, there is an option "Send email" which allows you to choose whether to send it to the editorial department or to the editor. Just to add, this journal only publishes two or three new articles online every day, which is ridiculously low. It feels like there are not many people working in the editorial department.

大熊 2023-03-05

The major revision was submitted on September 9, 2022 and has not changed until February 20, 2023. The status has always been "editor assigned". Starting from December, I have been sending monthly reminder emails, with the last one sent on the 20th (in an urgent tone). On the 21st, the status changed to "editor invited". On the 25th, it changed to "editor assigned" again. It has been a week and it has remained in this status. I don't know why the efficiency of this journal has been very low in the past six months, and everything depends on luck. I have previously submitted to this journal, and although the efficiency was not high, it would be completed in less than six months. Now, if you're lucky, it may take a little over half a year, but if you're unlucky, like me this time, it took half a year just for the major revision to be assigned to someone for processing. Be cautious when submitting, my friends. This is my last time submitting to this journal. Good luck to everyone.

小确幸 2023-03-03

It feels like it's all about luck. Congratulations on being hired!

SCI路上 2023-03-02

May I ask what the reminder email address is? It has been several months and there has been no progress!

KneeYu 2023-03-01

3.1 Accept! Couldn't resist sending the reminder letter for the manuscript at 4 PM in the afternoon, and accepted at 7 PM in the evening.

KneeYu 2023-03-01

I submitted around the same time as you. Xiao Xiu has returned for a month now and is still being assigned editing tasks...

小确幸 2023-03-01

9.1 Submit
9.18 Under Review
10.24 Reviews Completed
11.5 Editor Assigned
11.06 Major revision
1.04 Revision submitted
1.06 Editor invited
1.17 Under review
2.13 Reviews Completed
2.22 Editor Assigned
2.24 Minor revision
2.28 Accept
It took six months, with an average review speed of once every two months. During major revision, there were 7 experts and 65 comments (despair~). After major revision, it was submitted for review again. For minor revision, there were 2 experts and 16 comments, and it was directly accepted. Wishing good luck!!

liusuxion 2023-02-27

Update: It has been two months, and there is still no change. About ten days ago, I sent an email asking about it, and the reply said they are still looking for reviewers.

liusuxion 2023-02-27

The reply I received in the email says that they are still looking for reviewers. It's frustrating, it has been two months already.

KneeYu 2023-02-25

I see there are new online articles recently. It means there are still people in the editorial department. Why is it still showing "editor assigned" all the time? Are there so many articles that need to be handled? Has anyone contacted the editorial department? How did they reply?

Mr___L 2023-02-24

My "Reviewers Assigned" status has been ongoing for over two months. I wonder if this is considered a normal state?

小确幸 2023-02-22

I have not yet contacted the editorial department, and I waited for 13 days after receiving the notice of major repairs.

KneeYu 2023-02-21

@小确幸 Did the editing team run away? That's really scary. I've been back for 19 days and there hasn't been any movement at all.

小确幸 2023-02-21

The major renovation is completed and the external audit on the 13th is all finished. The current status is also motionless.

KneeYu 2023-02-21

Have the family members been in contact? What's the situation?

KneeYu 2023-02-17

@范雨: Inquiries regarding submission issues, peer review process, or manuscript status should be sent to Joshika Raj (joshika.raj@springer.com).

范雨 2023-02-15

Do you know how to contact this journal?

范雨 2023-02-15

Hello, what is the latest progress of your article?

KneeYu 2023-02-14

2.2 Assignment of Editors. It has been until now, but it seems that their editing team is on rotation.

liusuxion 2023-02-13

Hello, is there any news?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started