小柒 2023-03-15

Hello, I am also from MDPI. The probability of accepting a resubmission after rejection is high. If there were no suggestions for revision in the rejection, could it be because they were dissatisfied with the major revisions made in the first submission?

小柒 2023-03-15

Hello, I am also MDPI. The probability of acceptance after rejection by the journal and encouragement to resubmit is high or not?

苏绫人 2022-10-11

The first submission was rejected, but encouraged to resubmit. After making revisions, resubmitted and accepted directly.

swswsw12221 2022-08-03

This paper was later accepted by the top core SCI journal in Japan, which had previously inexplicably rejected it. I am a postdoctoral fellow, a master's thesis advisor, and hold the rank of associate professor. I have published over 30 papers, and it is impossible for a paper that I have put in so much effort and hard work to be directly rejected. From my observation, it seems that this journal may prioritize certain other aspects, so submitting to it may be beneficial for some people but potentially unfavorable for others. Please experience it for yourself.

dielianhua654321 2022-04-13

2022-3-14 Submission
2022-3-29 Minor revisions returned
2022-4-2 Revised
2022-4-9 Accepted
2022-4-13 Published online

In general, Insects is still doing well, with a steady increase in impact factor. It is currently in the second quartile of entomology journals with an impact factor of 2.769. The advantage of this MDPI journal is its fast review process, which saves time for authors. We hope to achieve a score of 3 in the future.

swswsw12221 2021-09-28

The submission was rejected within two hours. After a brief review, the article should have reached a responsible editor, who rejected it in about half an hour. When it was rejected, I was still reading the article in the system. Without being modest, I believe that submitting to this journal should have at least made it to the peer review stage. The rejection should have been at this stage, rather than the editor arbitrarily rejecting it for no reason.

子云 2021-04-16

Journal editors are toxic; their rejection reasons make no sense. Shortly afterwards, you will see articles similar to yours being published (submitted around the same time), and upon closer inspection, their methods are still flawed. It is advisable not to submit if it doesn't matter.