Mr.Curiosity 2023-07-04

May I ask how long it takes to produce the proof version after the formal acceptance? It has been half a month already.

Jessie 2023-05-19

With the editor for 14 days, why is it so slow now?

youge 2023-05-05

20230417 Submission
20230418 Allocation of manuscript number and editing
20230505 Rejection

yxy2021 2023-02-11

Did you submit it for review later?

yxy2021 2023-02-11

May I ask what happened to your article later? Did you submit it for review?

804 2022-08-11

May I ask how long it takes for your With Editor to produce results? It has been eight days for me and there is no news at all. I am very anxious.

ambitions 2022-07-30

Very good domestic journal

布鲁斯 2022-07-29

Already submitted, currently with editor for 12 days, why is it taking so long?

HAHA6789 2022-05-07

2021.6 ACS Nano tragedy of submission (2 accepted, 1 rejected), Argue got rejected, took half a year.
2022.2.19 Submit APSB
2022.2.24 Under Review
2022.3.11 Revision (The questions raised by the three reviewers were crucial, and they provided excellent constructive feedback. They were very professional and gave high praise. The quality of the paper also improved significantly.)
2022.4.7 Revision Submitted
2022.4.9-4.22 Status with editor-decision in progress-under review-review completed-decision nerve-wracking
2022.5.7 Accept
The speed was much faster compared to before. Thanks to all the editors and reviewers at APSB. I wish domestic journals continued to improve!

iamasia 2021-10-22

A good job definitely requires appreciation from the appropriate journal. Set your mindset right.

iamasia 2021-10-22

The SCI official website has issued a statement that APSB data was wrong. It is in the Q1 area, which is a highly reputable journal, not something chaotic.

iamasia 2021-10-22

The impact factor of APSB has been consistently increasing, only slightly decreasing in the second year. Is it possible that the journal has been mistaken?

iamasia 2021-10-22

Innovation needs to be supported by reliable data and results. A good job will definitely be appreciated by journals. Stay positive.

有一点点小梦想 2021-10-20

Now the first impression of an article being published in a journal is not whether it is innovative or not, but rather whether the amount of data is sufficient or not, unless you are a top-notch expert.

笑忘书 2021-10-09

The self-citation rate is calculated as a percentage based on (1 - IF without self-citation / IF). In 2021, the "without self-citation" component of this journal's SCI IF is definitely problematic and needs to be recalculated after the data is corrected. One can only wonder why Clarivate Analytics didn't perform any abnormal data validation for such a simple error...

Mikiwulala 2021-10-08

How could the self-citation rate be 98%? That's too exaggerated, isn't it? I specifically opened several articles and checked. Many articles have no self-citations, and some have at most 1 or 2 self-citations. How could it be this high?

wolong 2021-09-04

The editor's review and proofreading are very meticulous, and the reviewers are also very professional. The questions raised are very incisive. The journal's requirements for manuscript quality are getting higher and higher, and I hope this can continue!

lszy 2021-07-30

After approximately two or three days of submitting the application, it was rejected. This status should have lasted for about two days or more. I can't remember the exact details.

iamasia 2021-07-22

The database data statistics are incorrect, there is an official explanation, updated in October.

iamasia 2021-07-22

Good work is not afraid of rejection, it will definitely find a place to be published, so keep a positive attitude.

iamasia 2021-07-22

The journal impact factor is high, so there is definitely a huge number of submissions. It is normal to have both acceptances and rejections. Stay positive~

zwbyj 2021-07-19

May I ask what is the current status of your article? How long does the "decision in process" typically last?

坚持不懈的嗷 2021-07-15

Value the novelty of research and the solidness of results. As long as modifications and supplements are made strictly according to the opinions of the peer reviewers, the outcomes will be positive. Keep up the good work!

破坏神 2021-07-14

The impact factor of this journal has dropped significantly. From around 18 previously, it directly dropped to 0.2 in 2020, falling to Q4. What happened?

破坏神 2021-07-14

Definitely rejected, because none of them were submitted for review. The reason for the delay of a few days is to prepare a rejection letter or handle other manuscripts. Once I have some free time, I will give you the result.

lszy 2021-07-14

Excuse me, everyone. I submitted my application and it went into "with editor" status the next day. Then it changed to "Decision in Process." Does this mean it will be rejected? However, the status hasn't changed for a few days. Does this mean it's definitely going to be rejected?

zwbyj 2021-07-12

Just invested and found out that the self-reference rate is 98%. Is this how it works?

cocoa1008 2021-04-07

How long does it take to send for review? How long does it take to reject under review?