xuan ying 2023-07-18

What date was it submitted?

kkkk2 2023-07-17

Ten reviewers were sent for the first review, I don't know if it is a regular process.

hometown_1 2023-07-12

The speed is so slow. With Editor for a full 20 days, it has never changed. Is it always this slow now?

年少有为不自卑 2023-06-27

I would like to ask, how long does it take for the journal Food Bioscience to be indexed by WoS after going online?

饭团子A 2023-06-13

May I ask how long does it take for the proof? I have accepted it, but I haven't seen the proof yet. Is the proof sent to the corresponding author's email?

饭团子A 2023-06-06

How long do I have to wait for the proof? I have accepted it, but I haven't seen the proof yet. Is the proof sent to the email of the corresponding author?

PhD Gao 2023-05-29

The speed is really fast. The paper was under review with the editor within two days, and the review comments came back in about 10 days. Two kind-hearted reviewers gave high evaluations of the paper. Before this, I had submitted to two journals with an impact factor above 6, but they were directly rejected. After conducting an additional experiment, I submitted to this journal. After major revisions, the review comments came back within 5 days. I made minor revisions and submitted them. After a weekend, the editor directly accepted it. The speed is really fast. From submission to final acceptance, it took 1 month and 10 days. I am grateful to the reviewers and the editor. I hope domestic journals will continue to improve!

科研小小废柴 2023-05-19

There is no specific format. I used the format from Elsevier's "FOOD CHEMISTRY" and made slight modifications.

nopiont0 2023-05-06

Oct 24, 2022 Submission
Jan 22, 2023 First review notification
Feb 10, 2023 Revision after first review
Mar 1, 2023 Second review notification
Mar 2, 2023 Revision after second review
Mar 06, 2023 Acceptance
After the second review, acceptance was notified quickly, but there were some detailed modifications that took a long time, and waiting for the proof took a long time.

qian多多 2023-02-22

I want to submit to this journal. I would like to know if there is a specific endnote reference format. I haven't been able to find a suitable style! Please help!

科研小小废柴 2022-11-07

Two months after submission, I was informed about major revisions and given 20 days to complete them. There were two reviewers, one of whom was very detailed and provided many excellent suggestions. After making the revisions within 15 days, a minor revision was requested to address a few small issues. Following the minor revision, the paper was directly accepted for publication.

Upon receiving the proofreading, I realized that the journal was truly meticulous and had taken care of all the details very well. Very nice!

Wishing more success to domestic journals!

栗子a 2022-11-04

Add some information: Three reviewers and one associate editor have raised many questions.

栗子a 2022-11-04

9.9 Submit to the magazine
9.11 In the hands of the editor
9.12 Reviewing
9.29 Reviewing completed
10.3 Major revisions (given 20 days)
10.18 Revision
10.19 Second review
10.21 Second review completed
11.1 Accepted

sun yongjin 2022-09-26

Submission will be reviewed three days after submission. The reviewers are quite efficient, and the review comments will be returned quickly. After resubmission, it will be accepted within one month. Five days after acceptance, it will be published on the internet.

dafvhrt 2022-08-05

The reviewer was very meticulous and professional, conducting two major revisions and one minor revision. The process took 3 months and 20 days, and the revised version was accepted on the same day it was returned. The editor's efficiency is particularly high, as each major revision was externally reviewed on the same day. Best wishes for our domestically produced journals to continue improving.

我就是任性啊 2022-05-13

Submitted on January 5th, 2022, rejected on May 5th. The status had already shown external review completed in March, but it remained the same in April with occasional updates. It took a whole 4 months, and still, it was rejected. There were three reviewers, the first one provided detailed comments, but it was difficult to address the issues raised by the remaining two reviewers. The manuscript has been submitted to another journal.

源源 2022-05-02

Hello, I would like to inquire about how you applied for an extension and modification with the editor. Can I add you on WeChat? I would like to ask for some advice.

Acousma 2022-04-14

2022.1.27 submitted
2.26 major revision
3.22 Article revised (delayed by personal reasons for two weeks)
4.13 Article accepted for publication
Lasted for 77 days

作业发霉了 2022-03-04

The text has been translated into English as follows: Received on July 22, 2021, Revised on October 27, 2021, Accepted on January 30, 2022.

fenglilili 2021-12-22

This is the second article of the year, submitted on November 7th. On the same day, it was reviewed by the editor and after 2 hours, it went under review. On December 6th, there were minor revisions for 4 very small issues. For caution, it was revised on December 14th and on December 15th it went under review again. On December 22nd, it was accepted. It was really efficient, hopefully next year the impact factor will reach a new high.

巧克力工坊 2021-12-17

The submission has been with the editor for a month and a half. Yesterday, I sent a reminder, and today it was rejected. The reason given was that it is not suitable for publication in the journal. I don't know if it was because I sent a reminder email.

猫猫 2021-12-15

Hello, I wanted to ask which journal you transferred to and why it was so fast? Can you give me a reference? Recently, I have submitted to a few journals and waited for one or two months, but then I was rejected by the editors.

桔梗花 2021-12-15

The speed of Elsevier is indeed fast. I submitted yesterday, got rejected today. I don't know why it was rejected in seconds, but I still have some connections. Then I switched to submitting to another journal in the second district and it was immediately sent for review. This time, the foreigners are relatively nice, while our fellow countrymen can be quite biased...

芋圆仙草不要仙草 2021-11-19

Submitted in mid-July, revised on September 9th, and given one month's time. There were two reviewers, and luckily, their feedback was easy to address. After 20 days of revisions, it was accepted on the same day (the editor accepted it directly without sending it back to the reviewers). It was a pleasant surprise.

狗剩的二哈 2021-09-30

The efficiency is relatively high. Half a month after submission, I received extensive revision comments, which were highly pertinent from the experts. Due to the pandemic, experiments could not be redone. After sending an email to the editorial department, they agreed to extend the deadline by a month on the same day. The revised version was accepted in less than ten days. I wish domestic journals continued to improve and increase their impact factor.

fenglilili 2021-06-24

Posted on May 14th, with editor on May 18th, under review on the same day, minor revision on June 4th, revision uploaded on June 15th, under review on June 17th, accepted on June 23rd. It took 40 days, which is the fastest so far. I hope the impact factor will increase this year, as it is not easy for domestic journals.

缺月疏桐 2021-06-19

The entire food industry lacks high impact SCI (Science Citation Index) papers and is not included in NI (Natural Index) journals, which feels increasingly malicious. We hope that with multiple notifications from the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Education, domestic SCI publications can rise up and move forward with courage.

缺月疏桐 2021-06-19

Extracts from Zanthoxylum plants exhibit antibacterial and anti-nematode egg activities. Submitted on March 22nd, under review on March 26th, followed by a long wait. On May 8th, a major revision was requested by two reviewers, suggesting the need for additional discussions to reflect the significant scientific significance of the work. They also requested supplementary analysis on the chemical composition and its relevance to the observed activity. On May 10th, the revised manuscript was resubmitted and was again under review. On June 11th, a minor revision was requested, and on June 15th, the revisions were completed and resubmitted. On June 18th, the manuscript was accepted for publication. The process took a little over two months, and the smooth acceptance was expected since the target journal was JAFC (Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry), although it was initially intended for FBIO (Food and Bioprocess Technology) for various reasons. Hopefully, domestic food science and technology journals will continue to improve.

惜椿 2021-03-12

May I ask if the original poster knows if this magazine belongs to SCI (Science Citation Index) and in which category of Chinese Academy of Sciences is it classified?

王东伟 2021-02-17

Has "under review" been assigned to reviewers?