Alex 2023-08-08

2023.04.28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing
2023.05.01 Under review
2023.05.01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.05.01 Under review
2023.05.19 Awaiting Decision
2023.05.30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed)
2023.06.28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing
2023.07.01 Under review
2023.07.04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.07.09 Under review
2023.08.06 Minor Revision
2023.08.07 Resubmitted, Under review
2023.08.08 Accepted, Pending Export, Copyright transferred

Translated:

2023.04.28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing
2023.05.01 Under review
2023.05.01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.05.01 Under review
2023.05.19 Awaiting Decision
2023.05.30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed)
2023.06.28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing
2023.07.01 Under review
2023.07.04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.07.09 Under review
2023.08.06 Minor Revision
2023.08.07 Resubmitted, Under review
2023.08.08 Accepted, Pending Export, Copyright transferred

nbhai 2023-07-06

Caution! As mentioned by colleagues above, if you submit in the morning, it will be rejected as "out of scope" by noon. After careful investigation, I found that several articles on the same topic and direction as mine have been published before...

Joie 2023-04-02

Really, I have looked at all the papers and they all have either senior members or fellows.

Joie 2023-04-02

If your paper does not have senior members or Fellows, you don't have to submit it, otherwise the system will directly reject you with "out of scope". It really does require connections.

fsdfsdfc 2023-01-07

This journal is indeed filled with a large number of relationship hydrology articles that lack technical content. As for the reason, those who understand it know it well. Just read a few more articles and you will see it. I highly recommend IEEE SPL, which has much higher article quality.

神父的石头 2022-10-14

2022.6.24 Submission
2022.7.18 Rejection with resubmission allowed
2022.9.2 Resubmission
2022.9.25 Minor revision
2022.10.3 Resubmission
2022.10.4 Acceptance

吴迪小哥 2022-08-06

Is this a retaliatory mentality after being rejected? I think the quality of the paper is quite high. Otherwise, how could the author have submitted it and been rejected?

ziyoan 2022-06-28

2022. Submitted in February, rejected and resubmitted in April. After replying to each of the three reviewers' comments, resubmitted in May. Accepted in mid-June and early published a week later. The speed was exceptionally fast. Overall, the level and meticulousness of the reviewing process were higher than CL.

witcher005 2022-03-14

What is the difficulty of submitting contributions now, may I ask?

信仰faith 2022-02-24

Caution, academic journals are part of a circle culture. The quality of papers is significantly lower compared to IEEE SPL and IEEE CL. Many articles are filled with irrelevant content from well-connected individuals. It is estimated that in the next two years, it will be downgraded to the fourth tier.

ZDCV 2021-06-02

Hello, how many days did WCL give you to revise after your first rejection and resubmission?

ZDCV 2021-06-02

Hello, how many days do you have to resubmit your first-instance rejected manuscript?

手游吃鸡大师 2021-05-13

The H-factor of iotj is also over 40, which does not hinder its ranking as a first-tier institution in the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

苏维埃万岁 2021-03-23

Compared to Trans, it's much faster. It took a year and a half for the previously submitted TWC to be accepted. This one was accepted in just half a year, which is already very fast. A conscientious journal.

苏维埃万岁 2021-03-23

The first review took 42 days, the rejection was resubmitted, and it took one month to make the revisions. The second review took 2 months, with minor revisions submitted one month later. It took 6 days for it to be accepted. In total, the whole process took almost half a year.

njbsok 2021-03-12

Are you looking at the basic version or the upgraded version of the CAS zoning?

果小冻 2021-01-15

Could it be the h-index? WCL is only in the 40s, while CL is already at 127. It is indeed inappropriate for such a high impact factor to be in the 3rd quartile. Nowadays, everyone is submitting to CL.