伊寒 2023-05-22

I feel the same way. The comments from the reviewer were all very good, but the editor rejected it. It's such a waste of time.

w222 2023-05-07

"Not being blacklisted would be considered good enough."

bear2022 2023-04-19

Trash journal, reviewers agreed, associated editor agreed, but the editorial department rejected it, stating that it does not meet the section scope. If that's the case, why did they waste my time in the first place?

NianLi1997 2023-04-06

It's already cold, and we haven't found the third reviewer either.

NianLi1997 2023-03-14

One reviewer declined, and we are still waiting for the other's feedback. It is likely that it has been rejected.

NianLi1997 2023-02-21

It took two weeks of messing around before starting to look for reviewers, and now I still don't know the specific situation. The speed is really slow.

1005 2022-10-27

Dear experts, can we enter Zone 2 this year?

0.0-992229 2022-09-08

The review process went quite smoothly, although I feel that it could have been submitted with better quality. Nevertheless, it is acceptable. I hope it gets better and better.

大米哈哈 2022-08-29

The boss asked me to help him submit an article for his friend. It has been over two months now and it is still with the editor. I am speechless. The boss's friend is urging him, and he is urging me. I wanted to ask how long it takes to find a reviewer here. I sent an email on August 5th asking if there were any recommended reviewers. I received a response on the 17th, and until today, it is still with the editor and has not moved to the next step.

舍yhy予 2022-06-10

The submission was quickly revised, but later it may have been forgotten, delaying it for half a month. It is estimated that the reviewer forgot to review it, but after the editor's reminder, it was accepted the next day. In total, it took about one and a half months. The editor was very good and responsible, and the questions raised were also very pertinent. After the modification, it improved a lot.

麦田里 2022-05-30

May I ask how long it takes to receive the proof? It has been half a month with no updates.

hui 2022-05-26

I submitted an article over a week ago, but it's still under editor assignment. I'm getting anxious!! Can you please tell me how to follow up on my submission?

ttyqty 2022-05-25

The review process is fast, and there will be some limitations for submitting non-experimental articles.

麦田里 2022-05-23

May 2022 Article accepted for publication.
Nov 2021 submitted manuscript.
The first reviewer accepted the revised version after minor revisions, while the second reviewer made about 160 challenging comments (which we suspect were made by a competitor) and then disappeared without responding to our emails ?. We requested to withdraw the submission, but the journal refused and decided to find another reviewer. Finally, after further minor revisions, the manuscript was accepted again. We selected a Chinese editor who was very responsible and friendly, and handled the manuscript promptly.

rstylx 2022-05-16

You are quite lucky, and it must be very helpful to have an academician as a reviewer for your article.

panchenxi 2022-05-07

Although the process was a bit confusing, the journal was very responsible. They found an academician to review my paper. I was severely criticized, but I still managed to surprise them with an unexpected response. I don't think they expected me to answer this way, so they quickly agreed. Then, it was smooth sailing and my paper was accepted within two days.

tddtdd 2022-04-24

It's done, two weeks have passed, but the editorial assignment hasn't been completed yet. What's going on?? I'm in a hurry. Does anyone know what's happening? Should I follow up on it?

C3 2022-04-14

Comrade, our submission process is really too similar (tears streaming), except I am still endlessly procrastinating on my end and not even bothering to withdraw voluntarily. This magazine should simply be called "Procrastinators in Genetics".

C3 2022-04-14

This magazine is really unbearable. It has been nearly 4 months since I submitted my manuscript, and they keep delaying it. They initially assigned 4 reviewers, one of whom is still pending, another accepted it directly, but the other two seemed to be constantly targeting me regardless of how I revised the paper. After two revisions, they both rejected it. Alright, at this point, the magazine should have made a decision, right? But guess what, the handling editor never replied to any of my messages, and I have no idea what the editorial department is doing either. I sent four or five emails, and none of them received a response for days. In the end, I couldn't bear it anymore, so I sent a withdrawal letter, but they simply ignored me and found another reviewer to continue the review. They gave a response time of 2 weeks, but when I checked on the same day, they delayed it for another week. This is just like dealing with a rogue, I have never seen such a shameless magazine. By the way, is this what they call "Frontiers"? By the time they dragged it for so long, others have already taken the lead. How about changing the name to "Procrastinators"?

毕业的毕 2022-04-06

I also encountered the same situation as you. Despite all three reviewers accepting it, the editor found two more people to review it and ultimately rejected it with a lame excuse!

饮马长城 2022-04-03

I think this Surgeon master is a highly educated person, why is he so harsh in his speech? You have posted several of these, anxious to defend your lord, I would like to call your level of posting as top-notch. You accuse others of being quick to judge, but the news that the official website revoked, you think you are the truth just by looking at unofficial news, pointing to the sky and the earth here, really impressive. The list does exist in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, it's just not allowed to be published. The universities that were published have all been deleted... OK, if you don't believe it, forget it. In addition, the Chinese Academy of Sciences is not that "authoritative", I wish you good luck in submitting to this magazine and getting published! Also, thank you for your criticism. I don't know if I can make it into the fourth district, but submitting to another magazine and getting into the first district is also great. Also, I want to clarify that I didn't fail to make it into this magazine, but what I find rubbish about this magazine is: I lodged a complaint about our experience with the editor-in-chief of the column in this magazine, the great plant bioinformatics expert Andrew Paterson. They actually agreed to change the editor-in-chief for a new review after being rejected, and then delayed it. This is absurd, really fighting for a $2,000 page fee. So we took the initiative to withdraw the manuscript. Now the manuscript has been accepted elsewhere. I honestly share my submission experience, if it is of any help, great. I apologize to all readers for the slip of the tongue and I don't want to leave too many comments in the future.

Dr. Surgeon 2022-03-29

The early warning from Zhongxin Bank has already been revoked on the official website, big brother. Don't jump to conclusions so easily, this kind of thinking makes it difficult to make accurate predictions... If you can't make accurate predictions, please don't mislead others here.

饮马长城 2022-03-19

In 2021, the China Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI), high-risk journals and warning journals, have information on the warnings of this magazine. Saying that the Chinese Academy of Sciences is mine was a mistake, and I apologize. In short, this is my most genuine experience. I hope it is helpful.

饮马长城 2022-03-19

With them editing, we communicated and said that we would be happy to share our experience in submitting contributions. I did it truthfully... Being a research dog myself, stepping on such a landmine, it took me half a year to recover from the repeated struggles. It's heartbreaking... Please understand. I sincerely hope that everyone can avoid it! If I have disturbed you, all I can say is sorry!!!

rstylx 2022-03-16

I carefully checked, and this magazine has not been included in the warning journal list of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

rstylx 2022-03-15

A very good magazine, the reviewers are also very serious in giving editing suggestions.

Sun666 2022-03-11

The level of the magazine's reviewers is very high, and after the modification, the quality of the article has improved a lot.

letpub_li 2022-03-07

Brother, why are you everywhere? Just saw another magazine with your comment, exactly the same, copy and paste?

chenchong325 2022-03-02

Absolute rubbish, the chief editor decides everything, the review process is just a formality, a waste of time.

饮马长城 2022-02-25

Just saw that I was still listed on the early warning list by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021). I really thank you for rejecting me!