surgeon.zh 2023-07-31

Repeatedly requested to upload a large amount of data and original images, including the requirement to make the code public, which took a week altogether. However, the next day after completion, it was instantly rejected! It's simply speechless. Since they are not interested, they could have read the article first and then asked the author to upload the data. Now those data cannot be withdrawn, it's really unreasonable, negative review!

hudingding 2023-07-11

Hello, can you show me your review comments?

aar3278 2023-07-10

The first round of submission took 6 months, mainly due to the difficulty in finding reviewers. Two months later, there was a request for revision, followed by acceptance after one month of review. The reviewers' comments were very critical and greatly improved the article.

kimkimkim 2022-12-02

The editor's response is very prompt and meticulous. The reviewers are professional and rigorous. The overall review process is very punctual.

倒霉蛋啊 2022-11-02

You can try submitting to ESSD, but it is very slow. I reviewed for seven months and my major revision was rejected.

cheer17 2022-07-06

Submit the manuscript on June 27th;
On June 28th, each author receives an email;
On June 30th, the QC results are returned, and because the article lacks "code availability," it is supplemented and resubmitted on the same day. The status shows "Initial QC Complete";
On July 2nd, the status changes to "Editor Assignment";
On July 5th, QC returns again, and the editor refuses to accept the SRA reviewer link, requesting the data to be made public and the link to be modified. After making the changes, it is resubmitted, and the status shows "Editor Assignment".

谈波 2022-05-17

The editor is very polite and patient, with high efficiency and rigorous review. There are four reviewers, and three rounds of external review with constructive suggestions. They have high requirements for data quality, production process, metadata, and accuracy. Unpopular data requires interest and workload support.

问道琴声 2021-09-04

Journal Introduction: Founded in 2014, the Impact Factor (IF) quickly rose to 6.4. As the only data journal under Nature, it is expected to continue to rise significantly.
Annual Publication Volume: Around 400 articles per year, averaging 1 article per day.
Review Speed: The review process is fast, with prompt feedback. Results are given within 3 months.
Submission Results: From submission to acceptance, there was one major revision in between and it has been accepted.
Experience Sharing: This journal places great emphasis on the rigor of data and the importance of data validation. The submission process involves stages such as assistant editor, editor, two reviewers, revision, re-review (with a different reviewer), editorial board, and chief editor, lasting for 1 year. In addition to data analysis, dataset creation, and writing, it takes a total of 2 years to complete. Therefore, one must be mentally prepared for long-term submissions.