bjhsddfjdfkdf 2023-08-07

Hello, how to determine review submission?

JoyWalker 2023-07-19

Science Bullshit, China's most promising journal!

NIat 2023-07-17

Hello, may I ask if this journal requires a publication fee?

kingkingred 2023-07-17

Hello, will there be an email notification for submission review? It has been a month and it still shows "under review". Besides the initial submission email, I haven't received any further emails.

乙酰土杨酸 2023-07-14

About 4 months or so, overall it is still quite good.

kingkingred 2023-06-29

May I ask if there will be an email notification for the submission review? It has been over 20 days and there has been no movement, still under review.

稍远 2023-05-23

Hello, how to determine if it has been submitted for review? It has been ten days and the status has always been "ED, Editor Name, under review."

Dr.Fu 2023-05-11

This... In this situation, the editing should be checked shortly before submission. Moreover, under normal circumstances, the reviewer's opinions should only serve as references, and the final decision should rest with the editor.

Enlighten_qm 2023-05-07

May I ask if this journal charges a fee?

Dr_HIT 2023-04-28

Share the following updates. After submitting in February, the editor notified me to resubmit in the communication format.
19-Feb-2023: Submitted and currently under review.
15-Mar-2023: Awaiting AE (Associate Editor) recommendation.
20-Mar-2023: Under review.
21-Mar-2023: Major revision due on 01-May-2023.
11-Apr-2023: Submitted.
11-Apr-2023: Under review.
20-Apr-2023: Minor revision due on 11-May-2023.
28-Apr-2023: Submitted and currently awaiting ED (Editorial Decision) processing. Awaiting EM (Editorial Manager) final decision.
28-Apr-2023: Accepted and currently awaiting production checklist and assignment to batch.
It has been a difficult journey, but I hope the journal will continue to improve and not disappoint my hard work of over three years.

Dr_YZW 2023-04-15

I hope that domestically produced products will continue to improve! It is all a process, and with the endorsement from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, it may eventually be possible!

薛定谔猫 2023-04-11

The Science Bulletin now has an impact factor of over 20. At least based on the impact factor, it can be compared to Chem or even Nature Chemistry, right?

zhengyuze 2023-03-20

Do you need to make an appointment for the manuscript?

Gua741 2023-03-10

The journal's impact factor is indeed high, and it seems that the reviewers are all from within the country. Overall, the journal's quality is considered to be in the upper-middle range. I am very fortunate to be able to publish an article in a high-ranking domestic journal.

同志仍需努力 2023-03-06

After browsing a large number of papers on SB, I submitted my manuscript. At the very least, it can be confirmed that the quality of the manuscript is relatively high. It is also more focused on engineering applications and stayed in the editing stage for about 7 days without being sent for review. It is likely that the editor felt that the paper might not generate more citations.

sql544 2023-03-06

Posted on March 5, 2023.

protectzhuzhu 2023-02-23

Every floor is in darkness. Journals, professions, all dark. If you think it's rubbish, just don't invest and that's it.

protectzhuzhu 2023-02-23

This "[Lin Xi]" is a professional anti-fan, isn't it? They are criticizing every comment.

ggyyg 2023-01-25

The level of the papers in this journal is nowhere near as good as JARE's. It's unbelievable that it is even in the first quartile. It's truly speechless. Another new journal, Research, is also a mess. It just got an impact factor in 2021, and now it's already in the first quartile in 2023. Haha.

慧娜 2023-01-16

Did this journal reach the top of Zone 1? Huh??????

Yousi 2022-12-25

Hahaha...
I know I'm messing around, you also know I'm messing around, and I also know that you know I'm messing around. But I just like messing around.
Not only do I mess around, but I also pretend to be serious and prevent you from saying that I'm messing around.

林夕 2022-12-23

Many research institutions in the country will be assigned citation tasks. For example, you must cite a certain journal a certain number of times this year. Dark, isn't it? There are even darker things.

林夕 2022-12-23

Don't bullshit, there are not many research groups in China that would choose this SCI Bulletin. Chinese people privately treat this journal as a joke. You'd rather publish in PLOS ONE than submit to SCI Bulletin?

林夕 2022-12-23

Are you not afraid to say such things? Where does Sci Bull find international reviewers? How do you determine if they are international reviewers? If you can't submit to a real top journal, then you resort to exchanging benefits and publishing in these low-quality publications. I suspect that your article is indeed not wanted by any reputable journal!

林夕 2022-12-23

This is a rogue journal. I would rather submit to PLOS One.

林夕 2022-12-23

Indeed! It's better not to get involved with rogue magazines.

xscd 2022-12-21

This journal has become a haven for domestic academic elites. Previously, when I submitted my own paper there, it was not even sent for review. However, when I submitted it to a foreign first-tier professional journal, it was quickly accepted.

Recently, I discovered a data integration paper in the field of geology published in that journal. It selectively used data, disregarded previous research extensively, had numerous analytical flaws, and its conclusions were unreliable. Surprisingly, it was still published, all because it was authored by a renowned academician.

song 2022-12-19

The American boss helped a research group in China to revise a paper. The Chinese research group wanted to put the boss's name on it. However, when the boss learned that the paper was going to be submitted to this journal, he sternly told the other party not to include his name.

luofeiyu 2022-12-11

Microbial mouthpiece, the paper published in Sci Bull is submitted to the Journal of Bacteriology. I bet none of them can pass the editor's hurdle.

luofeiyu 2022-12-11

Let's talk about the level of our professional second and third-tier districts. I feel that this magazine does not cause any controversy. After all, what controversy can there be in a magazine for those with connections? Is the controversy about whether or not to provide such a platform for those with connections?