aixinbbb 2023-08-09

Is time really that long...

卡布达999 2023-08-08

3.16 submission, 2 reviewers, one has returned, the other still hasn't returned until now...

XingW-zy 2023-08-04

The second submission to JMP was relatively slower compared to the first time. The manuscript was submitted on March 17, 2023, and the revision notice was received on July 5. It was returned on the 21st, and finally accepted on August 3. JMP is a good journal in the field of manufacturing.

mmiaa 2023-08-04

03.03 submit
03.04 with editor
03.25 Required to reduce similarity rate
03.28 revision submit
03.29 with editor
04.03 under review
05.29 rrc
05.31 dip
06.12 revise
06.28 revision submit
06.28 with editor
07.10 under review
07.24 rrc
07.31 dip
08.03 accept
Except for the initial delay of one month due to plagiarism check, the whole process took about 4 months. This is a first SCI paper for a novice. Best wishes to JMP for continuous improvement.

爆炸科学系 2023-08-04

8.2 is still under review.

hyz@ 2023-08-02

7.16 under review - July 16th is being reviewed.
8.1 更新日期 under review - August 1st update date is being reviewed.

mreosng 2023-08-01

In the act link, there is a "send em" option, which should be sent to the managing editor.

SongYu-0610 2023-07-28

How to verify co-authors? The email has already been sent to the other authors through the corresponding author, but there was no author confirmation after registering an account with the journal. What could be the reason for this?

SongYu-0610 2023-07-27

Excuse me, once the other authors have completed registration, how do we confirm and proceed with the verification process for the co-authors?

didi 2023-07-24

Hello, I would like to ask if you send the reminder directly to the editor when you urge for the manuscript, or do you click "send email" directly in the message update section?

nitina2022 2023-07-22

There will be, at the slowest, a need for 2 days, which is when the editor decides whether to accept or give you a chance to modify.

nitina2022 2023-07-22

Sometimes when the editor is not busy, they will quickly find it appropriate. But if they encounter personal matters with him, then it becomes awkward.

nitina2022 2023-07-22

Submission in March.
Received feedback for revisions in late April.
Submitted revised version in mid-May.
Finally accepted recently, after a four-month process.
A reminder was sent during the process due to one reviewer declining the invitation for reevaluation. Thank you to the editor for accepting it directly.

ZSD1 2023-07-19

It has been two months with the editor. May I ask which editor handled it? Can you please let me know?

hyz@ 2023-07-15

6.13 submitted
6.25 with editor
7.15 still in the "with editor" status

1211 2023-07-09

Depending on the research direction, some editors are very slow.

1211 2023-07-09

More than a month is a normal speed, mine is also like that, it takes more than a month in the hands of the editor, and the reviewer finishes it in 10 days.

爆炸科学系 2023-07-02

6.30 Submitted to Journal
7.1 With editor
7.2 With editor, handled by associate editor
7.2 Under review
What happened? Why is mine progressing so quickly? I hope it doesn't end up being a tragedy.

小丁 2023-07-02

Excuse me, has your application status changed to "Decision in Process" yet?

Mitch 2023-06-29

2023.02.15 - Submitt (Submitted)
2023.02.18 - With Editor
2023.03.12 - Under Review
2023.05.01 - Requires Review Completed
2023.05.27 - Revision
2023.06.08 - Revision Completed
2023.06.12 - Under Review
2023.06.23 - Requires Review Completed
2023.06.27 - Accepted

The journal is good, but the speed is a bit slow compared to others. There was no reminder in between, and it felt like the first round was very slow, but it was quite fast afterwards. The overall time is similar to the average time for their journal.

mreosng 2023-06-29

My name is Prof. Shiv G Kapoor. The chairman on the homepage should be

所以荣耀 2023-06-29

Okay, thank you, OP! I am also a chief editor. The previous processing was quite fast. R1 went under review in just two days, and then RRC in about four or five days. It has been about ten days now. I plan to remind him in half a month.

wblzy1314 2023-06-28

Is Guoping editing it?

mreosng 2023-06-28

I remember it's been about a month. I should have urged it. I guess the managing editor is probably busy with important matters, but after urging, I didn't notice that it ended with Dec in pros.

所以荣耀 2023-06-26

I am also one of the two reviewers. Now that I have returned for revisions, the required reviews are completed. How long did your status last at that time?

mreosng 2023-06-26

Submitted on October 8th, 2022. It seems that it took two months to become "under review." The review process was completed on April 7th, 2023, and I was given 20 days. The comments from the two reviewers were manageable with 16 points to address. It was accepted on June 24th, 2023. I had to send three reminders during the process, but hey, this journal is just slow.

mreosng 2023-06-26

The journal is good, but it's just too slow. It takes 8 months to get the results, and it may also involve slow simulation.

符高琦 2023-06-24

投了一月份，修了一次四月份，六月份接受了。感觉有点慢。

maliyong 2023-06-17

I have submitted this manuscript for a year and a half, and it is still under review. The overall score is 82, and I will give it the remaining 18 points in the form of 666.

13133533301 2023-06-12

2023/03/17 submit
2023/04/13 major revision
2023/04/29 revision submit
2023/06/11 accept

Translation:

2023/03/17 - Submission
2023/04/13 - Major revision
2023/04/29 - Revised submission
2023/06/11 - Accepted