Frontiers of Computer Science
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Frontiers of Computer Science
FRONT COMPUT SCI-CHI
ISSN / eISSN
2095-2228 / 2095-2236
Aims and Scope
Frontiers of Computer Science aims to provide a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed papers to promote rapid communication and exchange between computer scientists. The journal publishes research papers and review articles in a wide range of topics, including: architecture, software, artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, networks and communication, information systems, multimedia and graphics, information security, interdisciplinary, etc. The journal especially encourages papers from new emerging and multidisciplinary areas, as well as papers reflecting the international trends of research and development and on special topics reporting progress made by Chinese computer scientists.
Subject Area
COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
6.20
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Mathematics - Theoretical Computer Science | Q1 | #20/127 |
Mathematics - General Computer Science | Q1 | #41/233 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
---|---|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS - SCIE | Q2 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - SCIE | Q1 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
25
Country/Area of Publication
PEOPLES R CHINA
Publisher
Higher Education Press
Year Publication Started
2007
Annual Article Volume
96
Open Access
NO
Contact
CHAOYANG DIST, 4, HUIXINDONGJIE, FUSHENG BLDG, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA, 100029
Verified Reviews
Review results:
Submitted in January 2021, received a response for the first review in July 2021, 6 months for the first review to be completed.
There were 3 reviewers, 2 were positive with not many modifications suggested, and they even provided related articles for citation. The remaining 1 reviewer was negative, emphasizing the lack of theoretical content and insufficient contribution.
Associate Editor: Suggested acceptance after revisions.
Action Editor: Rejected and prohibited from resubmission.
Conclusion: The review process was excessively long and the journal lacked any sense of human touch.
In other foreign journals, a situation like this would usually allow for major revisions or a chance to resubmit. However, not only did this journal delay for 6 months, but the rejection was also very thorough.
What's especially frustrating is that the AE recommendation took more than 40 days, and I held back from urging them. Finally, unable to bear it any longer, I asked about it, and the result came back three days later. The first review process took five months.
Currently, I have resubmitted it, as a letter does not fulfill the graduation requirements.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started