COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN
COMPUT AIDED DESIGN
ISSN / eISSN
0010-4485
Aims and Scope
Computer-Aided Design is a leading international journal that provides academia and industry with key papers on research and developments in the application of computers to design.
Computer-Aided Design invites papers reporting new research, as well as novel or particularly significant applications, within a wide range of topics, spanning all stages of design process from concept creation to manufacture and beyond.
Computer-Aided Design invites papers reporting new research, as well as novel or particularly significant applications, within a wide range of topics, spanning all stages of design process from concept creation to manufacture and beyond.
Subject Area
COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
CiteScore
6.20
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
| Category | Quartile | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science - Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design | Q1 | #18/102 |
| Computer Science - Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering | Q1 | #75/355 |
| Computer Science - Computer Science Applications | Q1 | #193/792 |
Web of Science Core Collection
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
|---|---|
| COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
103
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Year Publication Started
1968
Annual Article Volume
110
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Verified Reviews
Around 23.01.10, after 6 months, two reviewers requested major revisions, including the addition of a comparison with state-of-the-art methods, with a deadline of one month.
On 23.02.10, I completed the revisions within a month, responded to the reviewers' comments, and explained the reasons for not including the comparison.
On 23.05.10, the reviewers emphasized the need for the comparison and requested major revisions again. The editor considered the overall feedback and rejected the paper.
In summary, it was a waste of time.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started