Journal Title
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS

FUZZY SET SYST

ISSN / eISSN
0165-0114
Aims and Scope
Since its launching in 1978, the journal Fuzzy Sets and Systems has been devoted to the international advancement of the theory and application of fuzzy sets and systems. The theory of fuzzy sets now encompasses a well organized corpus of basic notions including (and not restricted to) aggregation operations, a generalized theory of relations, specific measures of information content, a calculus of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy sets are also the cornerstone of a non-additive uncertainty theory, namely possibility theory, and of a versatile tool for both linguistic and numerical modeling: fuzzy rule-based systems. Numerous works now combine fuzzy concepts with other scientific disciplines as well as modern technologies.

In mathematics fuzzy sets have triggered new research topics in connection with category theory, topology, algebra, analysis. Fuzzy sets are also part of a recent trend in the study of generalized measures and integrals, and are combined with statistical methods. Furthermore, fuzzy sets have strong logical underpinnings in the tradition of many-valued logics.
Subject Area

MATHEMATICS, APPLIED

STATISTICS & PROBABILITY

COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS

CiteScore
7.30 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Mathematics - Logic Q1 #2/41
Mathematics - Artificial Intelligence Q2 #80/301
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS - SCIE Q1
MATHEMATICS, APPLIED - SCIE Q1
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY - SCIE Q1
H-index
150
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Frequency
Semimonthly
Annual Article Volume
286
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Tragedy of one year and twenty-seven days for the first review. Two reviewers, R#1: doubts about the novelty of the proposed method; R#2: deletion of some non-essential elements.

(Basic) I have previously published a top-tier paper in this emerging field, and this article is also based on my previous work (identifying the shortcomings of existing methods in a certain aspect and comparing them with existing algorithms; the entire article analyzes and discusses the novelty of the proposed method).

Overall, both reviewers are talking nonsense (the editor's choice of reviewers is not from the relevant field of expertise), and they are only pointing out trivial issues, and most importantly, they are wrong. I want to ask, can you understand the article? If you don't understand, it's okay, don't make baseless comments and give misleading guidance. What are you questioning? Haven't seen it, so shut up. Also, the editor's handling time is also disappointing. Think twice before submitting!!!!
2021-03-30
FSS is becoming increasingly difficult to publish. The submission was made in November and received two reviewers who are clearly experts in the field. They provided constructive feedback and suggestions.
2020-11-28 Submitted to Journal
2020-11-30 With Editor
2021-5-28 Major Revision
2021-6-8 With Editor
2021-6-11 Under Review
2021-7-1 Under Review
2021-10-27 Required Reviewer Completed
2021-10-27 Decision in Process (Minor Revision)
2021-10.28 Revision Submitted to Journal
2021-10-28 Editor Invited
2021-10-28 Decision in Process
2021-10-28 Accept
2021-10-28

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now