标题
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volume 115, Issue 11, Pages 2628-2631
出版商
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
发表日期
2018-03-13
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1708272114
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- (2017) Daniele Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
- (2017) Denes Szucs et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains
- (2017) Estelle Dumas-Mallet et al. Royal Society Open Science
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century
- (2016) Daniele Fanelli et al. PLoS One
- Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
- (2016) Jay J. Van Bavel et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
- (2016) C. F. Camerer et al. SCIENCE
- What does research reproducibility mean?
- (2016) Steven N. Goodman et al. Science Translational Medicine
- The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
- (2016) Elisabeth M. Bik et al. mBio
- Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value
- (2016) Dorothy V.M. Bishop et al. PeerJ
- A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
- (2016) Alexander Etz et al. PLoS One
- p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research
- (2016) Stephan B. Bruns et al. PLoS One
- Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
- (2015) Daniele Fanelli et al. PLoS One
- Accelerating scientific publication in biology
- (2015) Ronald D. Vale PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices
- (2015) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
- (2015) Joost CF de Winter et al. PeerJ
- Rising complexity and falling explanatory power in ecology
- (2014) Etienne Low-Décarie et al. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
- The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
- (2014) R. Chris Fraley et al. PLoS One
- Quantifying the complexity of medical research
- (2013) R. Rodriguez-Esteban et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
- (2013) L. R. Jager et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
- (2013) Daniele Fanelli PLOS MEDICINE
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Letter to the Editor: Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources
- (2008) MARCUS R. MUNAFÒ et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More