4.7 Article

Reactive oxygen species metabolism and phenylpropanoid pathway involved in disease resistance against Penicillium expansum in apple fruit induced by E-poly-l-lysine

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 98, 期 13, 页码 5082-5088

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9046

关键词

Malus domestica; induced resistance; blue mould; reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31401554, 31501537]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDBlue mould caused by Penicillium expansum comprises a notable disease of apple fruit during storage. E-Poly-l-lysine (PL) consists of E-amino and -hydroxyl and has been used in food preservation. In the present study, apple fruits (cv. Fuji) were used to investigate the effects of PL dipping treatment, at different concentrations of PL, on the lesion diameter of fruit inoculated with P. expansum, aiming to screen the optimal concentration for controlling blue mould. The effects of PL at the optimal concentration on reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism and the phenylpropanoid pathway were also investigated. RESULTSThe results indicated that 25, 50, 100 and 200 mu L L-1 PL treatment significantly decreased the lesion diameter in apple fruit inoculated with P. expansum and the smallest lesion diameter was determined for 50 mu L L-1 PL-treated fruits. The results also indicated that 50 mu L L-1 PL treatment increased the hydrogen peroxide content and the activities of enzymes involved in ROS metabolism, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase and peroxidase in apple fruit. The activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and the contents of lignin, total phenolic compounds and flavonoids were also enhanced by PL treatment. CONCLUSIONThe disease resistance to P. expansum in apple fruits enhanced by PL treatment is related to activating ROS metabolism and the phenylpropanoid pathway and the accumulation of antifungal compounds. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据