4.7 Article

Comparative evaluation of tannic acid inhibiting α-glucosidase and trypsin

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 605-610

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.07.029

关键词

Tannic acid; alpha-Glucosidase; Trypsin; Inhibitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21166024, 10901169]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CQDXWL-2014-Z009]
  3. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [14HASTIT019]
  4. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing CSTC [cstc2012gg-gjhz10003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the inhibitory effects of tannic acid on the alpha-glucosidase and trypsin were systematically evaluated by comparing with the clinical diabetes healer acarbose and the soybean-derived trypsin inhibitor using fluorescence spectroscopy and enzymatic kinetics methods. We showed that the anti-alpha-glucosidase activity of tannic acid (IC50 = 0.44 mu g/mL) was higher than that of acarbose (IC50 > 0.60 mu g/mL), while its anti-trypsin activity (IC50 = 0.79 mg/mL) was significantly lower than that of the trypsin inhibitor from soybean (IC50 < 0.20 mg/mL). Enzymatic kinetics measurements confirmed that the inhibitory pattern of tannic acid toward two tested enzymes was a mixed competitive and noncompetitive inhibition. Tannic acid could bind the enzymes to form new complexes, presenting a strong static fluorescence quenching. The presence of tannic add led to the hypsochromic shift of the maximum fluorescence in trypsin, but not in alpha-glucosidase. The thermodynamic parameters indicated that the main driving force between tannic acid and both the enzymes was the hydrophobic interaction followed by the electrostatic interaction. Our work suggests that tannic acid is a strong anti-alpha-glucosidase natural inhibitor with a low inhibitory activity for trypsin, thus its roles in functional food and medicinal plants should be re-recognized. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据