4.3 Article

Interfacial behaviors of Sn-Pb, Sn-Ag-Cu Pb-free and mixed Sn-Ag-Cu/Sn-Pb solder joints during electromigration

期刊

MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 106-115

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.04.031

关键词

Electromigration; Sn-Pb; Sn-Ag-Cu; Mixed solder; Intermetallic compound

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SnPb-SnAgCu mixed solder joints with Sn-Pb soldering Sn-Ag-Cu Pb-free components are inevitably occurred in the high reliability applications. In this study, the interfacial behaviors in Sn-37Pb and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu mixed solder joints was addressed and compared with Sn-37Pb solder joints and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder joints with the influence from isothermal aging and electromigration. Considering the difference on the melting point between Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu and Sn-37Pb solder, two mixed solder joints: partial mixing and full mixing between Sn-Pb and Sn-Ag-Cu solders were reached with the peak reflowing temperature of 190 and 250 degrees C, respectively. During isothermal aging, the intermetallic compound (IMC) layer increased with aging time and its growth was diffusion controlled. There was also no obvious affect from the solder composition on IMC growth. After electromigration with the current density of 2.0 x 10(3) A/cm(2), Sn-37Pb solder joints showed the shortest lifetime with the cracks observed at the cathode for the stressing time < 250 h. In Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu Pb-free solder joints, current stressing promoted the growth of IMC layer at the interfaces, but the growing rate of IMC at the anode interface was far faster than that at the cathode interface. Therefore, there existed an obvious polarity effect on IMC growth in Sn-Ag-Cu Pb-free solder joints. After Sn-37Pb was mixed with Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu Pb-free solder, whether the partial mixing or the full mixing between Sn-Pb and Sn-Ag-Cu can obviously depress both the crack formation at the cathode side and the IMC growth at the anode. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据