Parents’ attitudes towards research involving genome sequencing of their healthy children: a qualitative study
出版年份 2023 全文链接
标题
Parents’ attitudes towards research involving genome sequencing of their healthy children: a qualitative study
作者
关键词
-
出版物
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2023-10-20
DOI
10.1038/s41431-023-01476-9
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Perceived utility and disutility of genomic sequencing for pediatric patients: Perspectives from parents with diverse sociodemographic characteristics
- (2022) Meghan C. Halley et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Health data: when children reach the age of consent
- (2022) Jillian Hastings Ward NATURE MEDICINE
- Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research
- (2022) Faye Johnson et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Adolescent and parent perspectives on genomic sequencing to inform cancer care
- (2022) Laura K. Sedig et al. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
- From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening
- (2022) Chloe Mighton et al. Frontiers in Genetics
- Outcomes of Returning Medically Actionable Genomic Results in Pediatric Research
- (2022) Amy A. Blumling et al. Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Widening the lens of actionability: A qualitative study of primary care providers’ views and experiences of managing secondary genomic findings
- (2021) Agnes Sebastian et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review
- (2021) Johanna Eichinger et al. BMC Pediatrics
- Preference for secondary findings in prenatal and pediatric exome sequencing
- (2021) Kate Swanson et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- An international policy on returning genomic research results
- (2021) Anna C. F. Lewis et al. Genome Medicine
- Parents’ motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview study
- (2020) Celine Lewis et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Reconciling Opportunistic and Population Screening in Clinical Genomics
- (2019) Kyle B. Brothers et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project
- (2019) Stacey Pereira et al. PEDIATRICS
- The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results
- (2019) Yvonne Bombard et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Gratitude, protective buffering, and cognitive dissonance: How families respond to pediatric whole exome sequencing in the absence of actionable results
- (2018) Allison Werner-Lin et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- The BabySeq project: implementing genomic sequencing in newborns
- (2018) Ingrid A. Holm et al. BMC Pediatrics
- Pediatric cancer families’ participation in whole-genome sequencing research in Denmark: Parent perspectives
- (2018) Anna Byrjalsen et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
- Tell me once, tell me soon: parents’ preferences for clinical genetics services for congenital heart disease
- (2018) Nadine A Kasparian et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences
- (2018) Michelle L. McGowan et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children
- (2018) Alanna Kulchak Rahm et al. Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Parents of a child with epilepsy: Views and expectations on receiving genetic results from Whole Genome Sequencing
- (2018) Iris Jaitovich Groisman et al. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
- Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
- (2018) Karen L. David et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment
- (2017) Megan A Lewis et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Sarah S. Kalia et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?
- (2016) J A Anderson et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Parents’ Perspectives on Supporting Their Decision Making in Genome-Wide Sequencing
- (2016) Karen C. Li et al. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP
- Building qualitative study design using nursing's disciplinary epistemology
- (2015) Sally Thorne et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists
- (2015) Kym Boycott et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
- Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between
- (2014) Gail P. Jarvik et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- The best interests of the child and the return of results in genetic research: international comparative perspectives
- (2014) Ma’n H Zawati et al. BMC Medical Ethics
- Cohort Profile: The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!)
- (2014) Sarah Carsley et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Whole-genome sequencing in health care
- (2013) Carla G van El et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Genetic Research and Implications for Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment
- (2012) Holly K. Tabor et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started