Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research
出版年份 2022 全文链接
标题
Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research
作者
关键词
-
出版物
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 520-531
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2022-03-08
DOI
10.1038/s41431-022-01054-5
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Ethical and Psychosocial Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for Newborns
- (2019) John D. Lantos PEDIATRICS
- Impact of Intermediate Cystic Fibrosis Classification on Parents’ Perceptions of Child Vulnerability and Protectiveness
- (2019) Audrey Tluczek et al. Journal of Family Nursing
- Actions and Uncertainty: How Prenatally Diagnosed Variants of Uncertain Significance Become Actionable
- (2019) Allison Werner-Lin et al. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Qualitative Research on Expanded Prenatal and Newborn Screening: Robust but Marginalized
- (2019) Rachel Grob HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- What Is the Psychosocial Impact of Providing Genetic and Genomic Health Information to Individuals? An Overview of Systematic Reviews
- (2019) Christopher H. Wade HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Yield of whole exome sequencing in undiagnosed patients facing insurance coverage barriers to genetic testing
- (2019) Chloe M. Reuter et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Health-care providers’ perspectives on uncertainty generated by variant forms of newborn screening targets
- (2019) Paul J. Azzopardi et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Increased parental anxiety and a benign clinical course: Infants identified with short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency and isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency through newborn screening in Georgia
- (2019) Roa Sadat et al. MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
- Consent for newborn screening: screening professionals' and parents’ views
- (2019) F. Ulph et al. PUBLIC HEALTH
- Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies
- (2018) Josephine Johnston et al. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Psychosocial Response to Uncertain Newborn Screening Results for Cystic Fibrosis
- (2017) Robin Z. Hayeems et al. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
- Reaching a Consensus on the Definition of Genetic Literacy that Is Required from a Twenty-First-Century Citizen
- (2017) Dirk Jan Boerwinkel et al. Science & Education
- Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine
- (2016) Ainsley J. Newson et al. BMC Medical Genomics
- Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID): A new designation and management recommendations for infants with an inconclusive diagnosis following newborn screening
- (2015) A. Munck et al. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
- Uncertain diagnosis after newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: An ethics-based approach to a clinical dilemma
- (2013) John Massie et al. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project
- (2012) Leslie G. Biesecker GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Parents' experiences of newborn screening for genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes
- (2011) N. J. Kerruish JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening
- (2011) Stuart G Nicholls JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Parents' Experiences of Expanded Newborn Screening Evaluations
- (2011) J. M. DeLuca et al. PEDIATRICS
- Revisting wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years
- (2008) Anne Andermann BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
- Is my sick child healthy? Is my healthy child sick?: Changing parental experiences of cystic fibrosis in the age of expanded newborn screening
- (2008) Rachel Grob SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started