标题
Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country
作者
关键词
-
出版物
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2020-10-14
DOI
10.1007/s11192-020-03733-w
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines
- (2020) Junming Huang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Mid-career field switches reduce gender disparities in academic publishing
- (2020) Mike Thelwall SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender disparities in the field of economics
- (2020) Junwan Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers
- (2020) Tove Faber Frandsen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Analysis of H-index in Assessing Gender Differences in Academic Rank and Leadership in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in the United States and Canada
- (2019) Hsin Yun Yang et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION
- Alphabetic or Contributor Author Order. What Is the Norm in Danish Economics and Political Science and Why?
- (2019) Dorte Henriksen Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency
- (2019) Holly O Witteman et al. LANCET
- Gender gaps in international research collaboration: a bibliometric approach
- (2019) Dag W. Aksnes et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field
- (2019) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Gender and Academic Rank in the UK
- (2019) Georgina Santos et al. Sustainability
- Gender distribution in psychiatry journals' editorial boards worldwide
- (2019) Dawood M. Hafeez et al. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
- Web of Science and Scopus language coverage
- (2019) Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Female Citation Impact Superiority 1996–2018 in Six Out of Seven English‐Speaking Nations
- (2019) Mike Thelwall Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Gender Disparity Among Leaders of Canadian Academic Radiology Departments
- (2019) Sadia Raheez Qamar et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Sex Differences in Faculty Rank Among Academic Surgeons in the United States in 2014
- (2018) Daniel M. Blumenthal et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals
- (2018) Michael H. K. Bendels et al. PLoS One
- Climate for women in climate science: Women scientists and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- (2018) Miriam Gay-Antaki et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- NIH funding longevity by gender
- (2018) Lisa A. Hechtman et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison
- (2018) Alberto Martín-Martín et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?
- (2018) Luke Holman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Celebrating women in science
- (2018) NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
- Advancing Science: How Bias Holds Us Back
- (2018) Maria Asplund et al. NEURON
- How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions
- (2018) Sabrina J. Mayer et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Fame in the sciences: a culturomics approach
- (2018) Ho Fai Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
- (2018) Alberto Martín-Martín et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Journals invite too few women to referee
- (2017) Jory Lerback et al. NATURE
- Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities
- (2017) Christine L. Nittrouer et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Relation of early career performance and recognition to the probability of winning the Nobel Prize in economics
- (2017) Ho F. Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Scholarly impact and the timing of major awards in economics
- (2017) Franklin G. Mixon et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations
- (2017) Matthias Potthoff et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts
- (2017) Neven Caplar et al. Nature Astronomy
- Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact
- (2017) Peter van den Besselaar et al. PLoS One
- Tenure Track Policy Increases Representation of Women in Senior Academic Positions, but Is Insufficient to Achieve Gender Balance
- (2016) Martha M. Bakker et al. PLoS One
- Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists
- (2016) Clemens B. Fell et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014
- (2016) Elisabeth Maria Schlagberger et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines
- (2016) John P.A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences
- (2016) Chad M. Topaz et al. PLoS One
- Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014
- (2015) Anupam B. Jena et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Gender balance: Women are funded more fairly in social science
- (2015) Paul J. Boyle et al. NATURE
- National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track
- (2015) Wendy M. Williams et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder
- (2015) Ian M. Handley et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The first cut is the deepest: repeated interactions of coauthorship and academic productivity in Nobel laureate teams
- (2015) Ho Fai Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception?
- (2015) Ho Fai Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis
- (2015) Tahereh Dehdarirad et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do great minds appear in batches?
- (2015) Ho Fai Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study
- (2015) Peter van den Besselaar et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
- (2015) Philippe Mongeon et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Under-Representation of Women on Dental Journal Editorial Boards
- (2015) Effie Ioannidou et al. PLoS One
- Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women
- (2014) J. M. Sheltzer et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- How stereotypes impair women's careers in science
- (2014) E. Reuben et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The implications of educational and methodological background for the career success of Nobel laureates: an investigation of major awards
- (2014) Ho Fai Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do the best scholars attract the highest speaking fees? An exploration of internal and external influence
- (2014) Ho Fai Chan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Matthew: Effect or Fable?
- (2013) Pierre Azoulay et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Science for all
- (2013) NATURE
- Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science
- (2013) Vincent Larivière et al. NATURE
- Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap
- (2013) Helen Shen NATURE
- The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship
- (2013) Jevin D. West et al. PLoS One
- Gender inequality in awarded research grants
- (2012) Gillinder Bedi et al. LANCET
- A call to commission more women writers
- (2012) Daniel Conley et al. NATURE
- Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students
- (2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?
- (2012) Pleun van Arensbergen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s
- (2012) Anne E. Lincoln et al. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE
- Organizing Contests for Status: The Matthew Effect vs. the Mark Effect
- (2011) Matthew S. Bothner et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Science gender gap probed
- (2011) Gwyneth Dickey Zakaib NATURE
- How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes
- (2011) Amin Mazloumian et al. PLoS One
- Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
- (2011) S. J. Ceci et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The Science Hall of Fame
- (2011) J. Bohannon SCIENCE
- Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations.
- (2009) Stephen J. Ceci et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
- (2008) F. Radicchi et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- DIVERSITY: Culture, Gender, and Math
- (2008) L. Guiso et al. SCIENCE
- A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts
- (2008) Michael Schreiber Journal of Informetrics
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started