Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison
作者
关键词
Highly-cited documents, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Coverage, Academic journals, Classic Papers
出版物
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2018-06-26
DOI
10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- How I scraped data from Google Scholar
- (2018) Holly Else NATURE
- Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
- (2018) Lutz Bornmann et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature
- (2017) Gali Halevi et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The accuracy of confidence intervals for field normalised indicators
- (2017) Mike Thelwall et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation
- (2017) Mike Thelwall Journal of Informetrics
- Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?
- (2017) Alberto Martin-Martin et al. Journal of Informetrics
- A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus
- (2016) Henk F. Moed et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
- (2015) Diana Hicks et al. NATURE
- Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar
- (2015) Enrique Orduna-Malea et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
- (2015) Philippe Mongeon et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Evaluating altmetrics
- (2013) Pardeep Sud et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study
- (2013) Joost C. F. de Winter et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators
- (2013) Emilio Delgado López-Cózar et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners
- (2012) Anne-Wil Harzing SCIENTOMETRICS
- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology
- (2010) Miguel A. García-Pérez JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management
- (2010) John Mingers et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar
- (2010) Judit Bar-Ilan SCIENTOMETRICS
- Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research
- (2008) Tove Faber Frandsen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started