4.7 Article

A time course metabolism comparison among Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii species in wine fermentation

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103484

关键词

S. uvarum; S. kudriavzevii; Central carbon metabolism; Nitrogen metabolism; Redox balance; Wine fermentation

资金

  1. FPI grant from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BES-2016-078202]
  2. Spanish government [AGL 2015-67504-C3-1-R, RTI 2018-093744-B-C31]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we presented the first metabolome time course analysis performed among a set of S. uvarum, S. kudriavzevii and S. cerevisiae strains under winemaking conditions. Extracellular and intracellular metabolites, as well as physiological parameters of yeast cells, were monitored along the process to find evidence of different metabolic strategies among species to perform alcoholic fermentation. A thorough inspection of time trends revealed several differences in utilization or accumulation of fermentation by-products. We confirmed the ability of S. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii strains to produce higher amounts of glycerol, succinate or some fusel alcohols and their corresponding esters. We also reported differences in the yields of less common fermentative byproducts involved in redox homeostasis, namely 2,3 butanediol and erythritol. 2,3 butanediol yield was higher in must ferment with cryophilic strains and erythritol, a pentose phosphate pathway derivative, was particularly overproduced by S. uvarum strains. Contrary to S. cerevisiae, a singular production-consumption rate of acetate was also observed in S. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii fermentations. Since acetate is a precursor for acetyl-CoA production which is involved in the biosynthesis of membrane lipids, cryophilc strains might take advantage of extracellular acetate to remodel cell membrane as ethanol content increased during fermentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据