Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript
出版年份 2019 全文链接
标题
Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript
作者
关键词
-
出版物
eLife
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
发表日期
2019-10-09
DOI
10.7554/elife.48175
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
- (2019) Ben Goldacre et al. Trials
- The annual cannabis holiday and fatal traffic crashes
- (2019) Sam Harper et al. INJURY PREVENTION
- Moving to a World Beyond “p
- (2019) Ronald L. Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Putting the P-Value in its Place
- (2019) Joachim I. Krueger et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Correcting Corrupt Research: Recommendations for the Profession to Stop Misuse of p-Values
- (2019) John L. Kmetz AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p-Value Ban
- (2019) Ronald D. Fricker et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known
- (2019) Robert J. Calin-Jageman et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Rein in the four horsemen of irreproducibility
- (2019) Dorothy Bishop NATURE
- Unit of analysis issues in laboratory-based research
- (2018) Nick R Parsons et al. eLife
- Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'
- (2018) Tracey L Weissgerber et al. eLife
- Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models
- (2017) Hannes Matuschek et al. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
- Evaluating methods of correcting for multiple comparisons implemented in SPM12 in social neuroscience fMRI studies: an example from moral psychology
- (2017) Hyemin Han et al. Social Neuroscience
- Harms of outcome switching in reports of randomised trials: CONSORT perspective
- (2017) Douglas G Altman et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Harms of outcome switching in reports of randomised trials: CONSORT perspective
- (2017) Douglas G Altman et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide
- (2016) Wolfgang Forstmeier et al. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
- Comparing dependent robust correlations
- (2016) Rand R. Wilcox BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Why Is the One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design Still Used?
- (2016) Thomas R. Knapp Clinical Nursing Research
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- The anova to mixed model transition
- (2016) Matthieu P. Boisgontier et al. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
- Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
- (2016) Anders Eklund et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
- (2016) Silas Boye Nissen et al. eLife
- A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
- (2016) Alexander Etz et al. PLoS One
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording
- (2015) Luke Holman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
- (2014) D. Colquhoun Royal Society Open Science
- Bias in a common EEG and MEG statistical analysis and how to avoid it
- (2013) J.M. Kilner CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
- Post-hoc data analysis
- (2013) Douglas Curran-Everett et al. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- (2013) Gregory Francis JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Does Chocolate Consumption Really Boost Nobel Award Chances? The Peril of Over-Interpreting Correlations in Health Studies
- (2013) Pierre Maurage et al. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Improving standards in brain-behavior correlation analyses
- (2012) Guillaume A. Rousselet et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- How to identify science being bent: The tobacco industry's fight to deny second-hand smoking health hazards as an example
- (2012) Kenneth Rochel de Camargo SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance
- (2011) Sander Nieuwenhuis et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- Everything You Never Wanted to Know about Circular Analysis, but Were Afraid to Ask
- (2010) Nikolaus Kriegeskorte et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Statistical and clinical significance, and how to use confidence intervals to help interpret both
- (2010) Judith Fethney Australian Critical Care
- Explorations in statistics: the bootstrap
- (2009) Douglas Curran-Everett ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION
- The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Multisensory Integration: Some Statistical Considerations
- (2009) Nicholas P. Holmes BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
- How does multiple testing correction work?
- (2009) William S Noble NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping
- (2009) Nikolaus Kriegeskorte et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- Comparing a single case with a control sample: Refinements and extensions
- (2009) Michael C. Corballis NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging
- (2009) Craig M. Bennett et al. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?
- (2008) Sara Schroter et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started