标题
Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'
作者
关键词
-
出版物
eLife
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
发表日期
2018-12-21
DOI
10.7554/elife.36163
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments?
- (2018) Stanley E. Lazic et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice
- (2018) Joanna Diong et al. PLoS One
- Data visualization, bar naked: A free tool for creating interactive graphics
- (2017) Tracey L. Weissgerber et al. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
- The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices
- (2017) David Giofrè et al. PLoS One
- Quality Reporting of Multivariable Regression Models in Observational Studies
- (2016) Jordi Real et al. MEDICINE
- Where Have All the Rodents Gone? The Effects of Attrition in Experimental Research on Cancer and Stroke
- (2016) Constance Holman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists
- (2016) Tracey L. Weissgerber et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- From Static to Interactive: Transforming Data Visualization to Improve Transparency
- (2016) Tracey L. Weissgerber et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Transparent reporting of research results in eLife
- (2016) M Dawn Teare eLife
- Transparency Is the Key to Quality
- (2015) Amanda J. Fosang et al. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
- Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm
- (2015) Tracey L. Weissgerber et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Raising the bar
- (2014) M. McNutt SCIENCE
- Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility
- (2013) NATURE
- Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance
- (2011) Sander Nieuwenhuis et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started